The decision of the High Court dated 4-4-52 bound the parties and its LexLords NRI Legal Services effect remained the same whether the reasons for the decision be sound or not. All the same the initiative to lodge a NRI complaint must be taken by the Governor himself and unless he has, in pursuance of his decision LexLords NRI Legal Services to lodge a complaint authorised a Secretary to sanction its being lodged the Secretary gets no power to accord his sanction. 3(2)(d) of the Madras Act. The learned judges of the High Court who rendered the decision on 4-4-52 had ample jurisdiction to decide the case and the fact that their was On was on the merits erroneous as seen from the later judgment of this Court, does not render it any the less final and binding between the parties before LexLords NRI Legal Services the Court.
It is not money handed over to some one for purchasing a thing which that person has failed to return even though no purchase was made. I cannot accept that as a reason for a moment. In our opinion the legislature had good reasons for leaving it to the Secretary to decide whether the lodging of a complaint by the Public Prosecutor should be sanctioned or not. But the learned Additional Solicitor-General contends that the Inam Rules framed by the Government providing for an inquiry, and particularly the rule directing the confirmation of title on the basis of possession, would amount to recognition within the meaning of s.
In this case no such inquiry appears to have been held in respect of Korpad Paragana. (2) that it was not a bad debt under s. There is no obligation upon the trustees to utilise the fund or any part thereof for promoting education in insurance, and even if the trustees utilised the fund for that purpose, it was problematic whether any such persons trained in insurance business and practice were likely to take up employment with the Company.
A debt in such cases is an outstanding which is recovered would have swelled the profits. A person who is directly aggrieved by the statement may not be in a position to take an NRI Legal Services LexLords objective view of an alleged defamatory statement and since the expenses for the prosecution will have to be borne by the State the legislature evidently felt that there was a good reason for leaving the final decision to a third person rather than with the aggrieved person.
These rules proprio vigore did not confer title on, or recognize title of, any inamdar. LexLords NRI Legal Services It is a relationship between a thing and a category which the point is in. fundamental misconception as it seeks to equate an incorrect decision with a decision rendered; without jurisdiction. This authorisation by him is as important as the sanction of the Secretary. On July 15, 1955, at an Extraordinary General Meeting of the shareholders of the United India Life Assurance Company Ltd. A wrong decision by a court having jurisdiction is as much binding between the parties as a right one and may be superseded only by appeals to higher tribunals or other procedure like review which the law provides.
2 lakhs from out of the Share. They lay down only a procedure for ascertaining the titles in those areas where an inquiry was held for the purposes of investigation of titles and confirmation thereof. A further variety to the product, typically used for incorporating additional specific kinds from exterior vocabularies in microdata syntax. Beneath the Act, the Bar Council of India would be the supreme regulatory body to control the authorized job in India as well as to make sure the compliance with the legislation and maintenance of Expert criteria from the legal profession from the state.
Inam Rules were framed by the Government 765 in 1859 for investigating into the titles of various inamdars and for enfranchising inams. Here again the appellant bases its ‘claim on the agreement dated April 17 1941, and contends that the agreement is binding on the respondents and the appellant cannot be, asked to pay income-tax by reason of the provisions of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 which were extended to the whole of India except the State of Jammu and’ Kashmir as a result of certain amendments inserted in.
214 of 1956 are the same as those given above, the only point of distinction being that this appeal relates to income-tax while the other relates to excise duty. We cannot accept this contention. We find it very dimrult to agree with the High Court that mere inaction on the part of the Government amounts to recognition of the grants in favour of the Inamdars. This argument procceds on, a. Before proceeding, with,, ‘these arguments ,in detail, we can dispose of the; second contention very shortly.
There is, thus, no substance in this contention. In our view the High Court went wrong in holding that the British Government recognized the said inams. These rules do not therefore help the State. ” The trust has numerous objects one of which is undoubtedly to promote art, science, industrial, technical or business knowledge including knowledge in banking, insurance, commerce and industry. The Secretary is expected to look at the question objectively and decide whether it is in the public interest to take notice of the alleged defamatory statement and prosecute the person who made it.
, a resolution was passed, among other matters sanctioning a donation of Rs.