NRI Legal Services – https://sometimesbadboy.tumblr.com. She is a prosecution witness. In our opinion, the appreciation of evidence by the NRI Legal Services trial court of these witnesses is sound and proper. The said ijaradar should make his own arrangement for the NRI Legal Services cultivation of the ijara property, get it cultivated 1090 by others, realise the nakdi and jinsi income of the ijara property from the tenants and appropriate the produce of both the shares thereof. We have, with the assistance of learned counsel for the parties, carefully perused the evidence, particularly, the evidence of PW-19, PW-27, PW-30, PW-31, besides PW-34.
We are constrained to observe that the High Court was dealing with an appeal against acquittal. A perusal of the Schedule to the lease shows that what was demised thereunder was a parcel of land of an area of about 213 square yards with New NRI Legal Services Survey No. ” The document then allocates the liability in respect of improvements and sums spent in regard to boundary disputes to one or other of the parties to the document and then it continues to state: demand in respect of tile produce or the income of the ijara property so long as the ijara deed is intact except getting Rs.
She was never declared hostile. The Schedule leaves no room for doubt as to what was demised. The question is whether this view of the returning officer is right. This clause runs as follows: Once the sanction/approval is granted on or before 15th July of the relevant year, the name of that college and all seats shall be included in both the first and the second counselling, in accordance with the Rules.
If any such approval is granted after 15th July of any year, it shall only be operative for the next academic year and not in the current academic year. 1, the executant, and my heirs and representatives neither have nor shall have any right, claim and. 14 crores, making it a total of Rs. As a consequence, the value of the property in question increased considerably, (ii) that during the pendency of the recall application, the first respondent herein, who had already deposited an amount of Rs.
Clause 1 of the lease may be quoted as the respondents have strongly relied upon this clause in support of their contention that what was demised under the lease was not only the land but also the building to be erected thereon. The explanation offered by the appellant has not been accepted by the High Court by invoking proviso to Section 13(1)(e). 1/2600 cadestral survey No. 40,000/- by him from her should not be believed. They are: (i) by a notification dated 04.
In other words, the scheme of the Act appears to be that where a candidate is an elector of a different constituency he has to prove that fact in the manner prescribed and the production of the prescribed copy has to be taken as conclusive evidence of the said fact. ” The ijaradar of this ijara deed or his heirs and representatives on his own authority shall be competent to bring the thika property into his sir possession as ijara property as a representative of me, the executant, in accordance with the stipulations made in the patta and kabuliats after setting off Rs.
The High Court has opined that since the amount allegedly received by the appellant from his mother-in-law had “not been intimated in accordance with the provisions of law”, his explanation is not acceptable and the appellant would be deemed to have committed criminal misconduct within the meaning of Section 13(2) of the 1988 Act. 160 crores as a condition precedent for filing the recall application, further enhanced his offer by another NRI Legal Services Rs. After 15th July of each year, neither the Union of India nor the Medical or Dental Council of India shall issue any recognition or approval for the current academic year.
40 crores, pursuant to the order of the Company Court dated 9. 2014 of the Government of Gujarat, the FSI applicable to the area in which the land is located is increased from 1. As a matter of fact, the main sustenance is sought by the High Court of its view on the basis NRI Legal Services of her evidence. We are unable to appreciate the submission of learned counsel for the State that PW-31, being the mother-in- law of the appellant who had supported the explanation offered by the appellant regarding receipt of Rs.
2014 and deposited the said amount, and it appears that the respondent agreed to further enhance the offer by another Rs. Two factors weighed heavily before the Company Judge for recalling the earlier Order dated 17. This requirement had not been complied with by Jai Bhagawan and the returning officer thought that the said non-compliance with the provisions of s. The prosecution cannot wriggle out of her statement. 435-4-0, the rent after the payment and deduction of interest on the peshgi money bearing interest.
33(5) justified him in rejecting the nomination paper under s. Under the terms of the lease the rent payable for this land was Rs. The terms of the lease show that the land was demised for the purpose of constructing a building thereon by the lessees. On the other hand, the High Court has fallen into an error by treating the case as one under Section 13(1)(e) read with Section 13(2) of the 1988 Act and by proceeding to hold the appellant guilty by invoking the Explanation to Section 13(1)(e), which Explanation is conspicuous by its absence insofar as Section 5(1)(e) of the Act is concerned.
2013 by his Order dated 11. 2,205 the peshgi money due to the thikadars by me, the executant, against the annual thikadari rent.