It, is dismissed except for interest granted by us. The State of Uttar Pradesh(3). That the power of the State Government to acquire land for the Trust is not taken away by the Bihar Act is further shown by s. Apart from that, bearing in mind the general outline of the device employed by the appellants’ firms it would not be reasonable to assume that consignments, the railway receipts had been tampered with were endorsed in favour of Murarka Brothers.
On the whole, therefore, we think that the expla- nation given by Chandrika Singh is reasonable and he is at least entitled to the benefit of doubt. The residents of village Gudur filed a suit for a declaration that the Government had no right to alter or NRI Legal Services by LexLords extend or add to the Chennur anicut over the river, and stated in the plaint that it was not necessary to ask for a permanent injunction as the Government was bound to give effect to the declaration granted by the Court.
Omitting as immaterial for the present purpose the last words defining the geographical area of the guaranteed movement, we agree that the right to “‘move” denotes nothing more than a right of locomotion, and that in the context the adverb “‘freely” would only connote that the freedom to move is without restriction and is absolute, i. 19 (1) (d) the “freedom” here guaranteed is a right “to move freely” throughout the territory of India. 119, 820 particular- (a).
39 of the Act empowers the Board to take charge of the goods for the purpose of performing certain services which do not include the taking delivery of the goods from the NRI Legal Services LexLords ship-owner. III the circumstances, therefore, we set aside the conviction under s. In the result this appeal fails except for the grant of interest. It is true NRI Legal Services LexLords that on the Board’s taking charge of the goods and giving a receipt about it to the ship-owner, the master or the owner of the vessel is absolved from liability for any loss or damage which may occur to the goods which had been landed, but this provision by itself does not suffice to convert the receiving of the goods by the Board after they had been landed by the ship-owner to the Board’s taking delivery of those goods on behalf of the consignee.
Technically -speaking, this direction cannot be said to be retrospective because it takes effect from a date subsequent to the date of the reference. as well as the sentences passed on him. The respondent then filed a writ petition in the High Court for cancellation of the said order, which was set aside and the case was remanded for disposal in accordance with law; The respondent then moved for the cancellation of the said allotment on the ground that he needed the premises for his own use, but the allotment was confirmed in favour of the appellant by, the Additional Deputy Commissioner.
Lord justice-Clerk construed those words as not being equivalent to prior to the passing of a statute. 17A(4) or the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (No. In that case, the majority after referring to all these (1) [1959] 2 S. The previous are structured in four Inns of Court (Lincoln’s Inn, Inner Temple, Middle Temple, Grey’s… …on the courtroom) or maybe a LexLords NRI Legal Services (a basic legal adviser who specials with all types of legal company out of court docket and who may perhaps act as an LexLords NRI Legal Services in several of the reduced courts).
33(3) “‘Subject to rules as may be prescribed for regulating the form and contents of master plan, a master plan shall include such maps and such descriptive matters as may be necessary to illustrate any proposal of schemes with such degree of details as may be appropriate to different parts of the area, and any such master plan may in (1) 37 Sc L. 14 of 1947), it is open to the Industrial Tribunal to name the date from which it should come into operation, and in cases where the Indus- trial Tribunal thinks that it is fair and just that its award should come into force from a date prior to the date of reference, it is authorised to issue such a direction.
Next we come to the last case on the point, namely, Deep Chand v. (2) [1954] INSC 89; [1955] 1 S. The appeal 995 of the Corporation is dismissed with costs. Dunferuline District Committee (1) on similar words viz “‘previously in use”. Its relevant part is as follows :- S. Meanwhile, the tenant intimated to the respondent by telegram that he had vacated the premises, but prior to the receipt of the telegram, the appellant bad applied to the Additional Deputy Commissioner that since the premises were likely to fall vacant, they should be allotted to him as he was a displaced person, and provisional allotment was made in his favour and he continued to be in possession since then.
245 and 246 was sufficient to indicate that there was no competency in Parliament or a State legislature to make a law which comes into clash with part III of the Constitution after the coming into force of the Constitution. 33 of that Act which deals with the preparation of a master plan by the Trust. The Company, shall, bear its own costs and pay that of the Corporation. The question that has next to be considered is whether the intrusion into the residence of a citizen and the knocking at his door with the disturbance to his sleep and ordinary comfort which such action must necessarily involve, constitute a violation of the freedom guaranteed by Art.
19 (1) (d) or “a deprivation” of the “personal liberty” guaranteed 344 by Art. The Board simply takes charge of the goods on being required by the steamer-agent to take charge of it. There will be a night to set-off the costs in the two appeals. 931 Finally, it was added that a mere reference to the provisions of Art.