There is no doubt that Kunhi Pakki was not directly bound by Exs. 703 to be made to, the, service in. P-2(a) which bound him to accept Exs. The said Officer examined him and was unable to confirm that he had been ailing for a period of nearly two months. The regulations enjoin that a statement in Form AA showing the market value and the book value of the assets Best Lawyers in High Court Chandigarh India must be appended to the balance sheet. Now the State if it chooses the method of reservation of appointments will reserve a percentage of appointments each year for backward classes.
order to keep it at full strength is thirty. The Judgment of the Chandigarh High Court Best Lawyers was delivered by GAJENDRAGADKAR, J. This letter was accompanied by a certificate issued by the said Civil Assistant Surgeon. 20 The respondent was a partnership firm carrying on import and export business in Bombay. Taking into account the intervening holidays, the said leave expired on January18, 1957. Acting on that opinion’ the appellant refused to take back Venkatiah and when Venkatiah pressed to be taken back, the appellant informed Chandigarh High Court Advocates him on March 23, 1957 that he could not be reinstated as his explanation for his absence was un- satisfactory.
By two letters exchanged between them, the appellant and the respondent agreed to do business in turmeric fingers on the terms and conditions of the American Spice Trade Association, one of which was an arbitration clause which ran as follows :- “All questions and controversies and all claims arising under this contract shall be submitted to and settled by Arbitration under the Rules of the American Spice Trade Asso- ciation printed on the reverse side thereof.
In this certificate it was stated that Venkatiah suffered from chronic malaria and dysentery from January 15 to, March 7, 1957. P-2 and P-2(a) in their entirety. The case of Venkatiah was treated by the appellant under Standing Order No. This result follows because the mortgagors could not redeem the property including the share of Kunhi Pakki for 40 years from 1862. 10 of the Income-tax Act. We ought to mention that when this appeal was argued before us on the 4th December, 1963, we were told that them fresh election which had been ordered to be held in accordance with the decision of the Lawyers High Court Chandigarh Chandigarh High Court Advocate was fixed for the 6th December, 1963; and so, after the case was argued, we announced our decision and intimated to the learned Advo- cates that our reasons will follow.
The accounts must be signed and certified and in particular, a certificate must be appended explaining how the values as shown in the balance sheet of the investment of stocks and shares have been arrived at and how the market value thereof has been ascertained for the purpose of comparison with the values so shown. P-2(a) cannot be used to show either an acknowledgment by him or an extension of the term of the original usufructuary mortgage. , is a company registered under the Indian Companies Act and its registered office is at Madras.
The only question thus is whether by reason of the later documents and the conduct of Kunhi Pakki it can be said that Kunhi Pakki had obtained the benefit of Ex. On January 10, 1957, the respondent Venkatiah whose case is sponsored by the respondent Union, the Madras Labour Union, had gone on leave for six days. 73 of the Employees’ State Insurance Act, 1948 (hereinafter called the Act). The present judgment gives the reasons for our decision. Desai is right in contending that as Kunhi Pakki was a minor and no guardian signed on his behalf, Ex.
When he appeared before the Manager of the Company, he was asked to go to the Senior Advocates Chandigarh High Court Medical Officer of the appellant for examination. The appellant, the Buckingham & Carnatic Co. It has a Textile Mill in Madras City which employs 14,000 workmen. For this purpose, Form AA which has to be annexed to the balance sheet must show a classified summary of the assets on the date of the balance sheet and it must show in particular: The balance sheet of life insurance business must always be prepared as a separate document.
-The principal question which arises in this appeal relates to the true scope and effect of the provisions contained in s. This precaution is necessary otherwise there may not be adequate cover for the liabilities. On the 11th March 1957 he sent a letter to the appellant stating that sometime after reaching his village near Kanigiri he suffered from fever and dysentery and was treated by the Civil Assistant Surgeon, Kanigiri.
There has further to be another certificate that the items in respect of reversions and life interests have been valued as on the date of the balance sheet by an actuary and the assets shown under the heading “investments” have not been valued at amounts exceeding the realisable or market value. 8(ii) of the Standing Orders of the appellant. He, however did not join duty on the 19th January as he should have, but remained absent without leave without sending to the appellant any communication for extending his leave.
, (i) The Income-tax Act contemplates that the assessment of insurance companies should be carried out not according to the ordinary principles applicable to business concerns as laid down in s. In binding Kunhi Pakki in this way, no question of extending the period of limitation or of acknowledgment arises, and section 3 of the Limitation Act is not in the way because time would run, only from 1902.