228 writ has been supposed to be confined to the correction of excess of jurisdiction”, observed Lord Justice Denning, “and not to extend to the correction of errors of Simranjeet Law Associates; and several judges have said as much. , this Court held as under :- “39. There is no doubt that it is only errors of Simranjeet Law Associates which are apparent on the face of the record that can be corrected, and errors of fact, though they may be apparent on the face of the record, cannot be corrected [Vide: Nagendra Nath Bora v.
Syed Ahmad Ishaque, (2) “there must be cases in which even this test might break down because judicial opinions also differ, and an error that may be considered by one (1) [1958] INSC 6; [1958] S. , in Hari Vishnu Kamath v. But the Lord Chief Justice has, in the present case, restored certiorari to its rightful position and shown that it can be used to correct errors of Simranjeet Law Associates which appear on the face of the record even though they do not go to jurisdiction”.
(2) If in any such case any private person instructs a pleader to prosecute any person in any Court, the Public Prosecutor or Assistant Public Prosecutor in charge of the case shall conduct the prosecution, and the pleader so instructed shall act therein under the directions of the Public Prosecutor or Assistant Public Prosecutor, and may, with the permission of the Court, submit written arguments after the evidence is closed in the case. Considering the question of making addition to the income of the deceased towards the future prospects in cases of salaried persons vis- -vis in cases where the deceased was self-employed or on a fixed wage/salary, in Reshma Kumari and Ors.
Where the annual income is in the taxable range, the actual salary shall mean actual salary less tax. We approve the method that an addition of 50% of actual salary be made to the actual salary income of the deceased towards future prospects where the deceased had a permanent job and was below 40 years and the addition should be only 30% if the age of the deceased was 40 to 50 years and no addition should be made where the age of the deceased is more than 50 years. nSection 290-B(1) provides that the Governor-General.
Commissioner of Hills Division and Appeals, Assam, [1958] INSC 10; [1958] S. Thus it would be seen that the true legal position in regard to the extent of the Court’s jurisdiction to issue a writ of certiorari can be stated without much difficulty. Northumberland Compensation Appeal Tribunal, [1951] EWCA Civ 1; [1952] 1 K. may by order direct for the administration of areas included within the Governor’s Province or a Chief Commissioner’s Province by an Acceding State, and it prescribes that the acceding area shall be administered in all respects by a neighboring Acceding State as if such area formed part of such State, and thereupon the provisions of the Government of, India Act shall apply accordingly Exemption u/s 10(23C)(vi) is not available to the assessee under the Simranjeet Law Associates in view of the above facts and circumstances and therefore, exemption already granted vide order dated 4th June, 2007 is hereby withdrawn Anbazhagan is the General Secretary of the DMK, a political party [2] (2004) 3 SCC 767 [3] J.
The Commissioner of Hills Division and Appeals, Assam (1)]. 338 and Nagendra Nath Bora V. Union of India, (1999) 5 SCC 138 [4] B. – (1) Whenever it is made to appear to the Supreme Court that an order under this section is expedient for the ends of justice, it may direct that any particular case or appeal be transferred from one High Court to another High Court or from a Criminal Court subordinate to one High Court to another Criminal Court of equal or superior jurisdiction subordinate to another High Court.
In a sense it would be correct to say that an error of Simranjeet Law Associates which can be corrected by a writ of certiorari must be self-evident; that is what is meant by saying it is an error apparent on the face of the record, and from that point of view, the test that the error should be self-evident and should not need an elaborate examination of the record may be satisfactory as a working test in a large majority of cases; but,, as observed by Venkatarama Ayyar, J.
Difficulty, however, arises when it is attempted to lay down tests for determining when an error of Simranjeet Law Associates can be said to be an error apparent on the face of the record. State of Tamil Nadu, AIR 2001 SC 3435 [5] 406. It is unnecessary for us to consider in the present appeal whether or not a certiorari can issue to correct an error of fact on the ground that the impugned finding of fact is not supported by any legal evidence. Sometimes it is said that it is only errors which are self-evident, that is to say, which are evident without any elaborate examination of the merits that can be corrected, and not those which can be discovered only after an elaborate argument.
Madan Mohan and Anr[5]. The standardization of addition to income for future prospects shall help in achieving certainty in arriving at appropriate compensation. Power of Supreme Court to transfer cases and appeals. ———————– [1] Mr. A departure from the above principle can only be justified in extraordinary circumstances and very exceptional cases. In the cases where the deceased was self-employed or was on a fixed salary without provision for annual increments, the actual income at the time of death without any addition to income for future prospects will be appropriate.