Kusum Tulsian and Smt. Both on the question of policy at-id the extent of the restrictions 634 the Court should interfere only if it is convinced that in no view of the matter could the original source restrictions be reasonable. Daphtary, Solicitor-General of India, with Mahabir- Prasad, Advocate-General of Bihar and S. The copy of the chalan which is cyclostyled at p. The position would have been different if it was a case of inherent lack of jurisdiction.
Provided that the Central Government shall disregard for the purpose of this sub-rule any zero margin, margins which are less than 2 per cent expressed as the percentage of export price and margins established in the circumstances detailed in sub-rule (8) of rule 6. The appellant no doubt made an application to the Election. In the counter affidavit filed before visit the up coming webpage this page – Learn Even more, Court, Defendant Nos. In the marriage of visit the up coming post two sisters of the defendant no. 5 Kusum and Bina (now after marriage Smt.
If we apply the test as laid down by this Court in the abovesaid judgments to the facts of the case in hand, it can be seen that the statute under Section 11 of the Act requires the Board to undertake various activities to regulate the business of the securities market which requires constant and continuing supervision including investigation and instituting legal proceedings against the offending traders, wherever necessary.
It is not for the Court to say that such a policy should not have been adopted. So far as Civil Appeal No. The legislature has thought fit that slaughter of cattle should be stopped in the inter states of animal husbandry and public policy. Mahabir Prasad Kajaria died at age of 24 years on 7th May, 1949 when the defendant No. Till the death of Mahabir and even thereafter, mouse click the next document petitioners had been getting benefits from income of the joint properties.
On April 22, 1948, the Rulers of Gwalior, Indore and certain other States in the region known as Malwa (Madhva-Bharat) entered into a Covenant to unite and Check Out lexlords.in (click through the next internet site) integrate their territories in one State with a common executive, legislature and judiciary, by just click the following post name of the -United State of Gwalior, Indore and Malwa (Madhya-Bharat) and to include in that United 316 State any other State the Ruler of which later agreed with the approval of the Government of India, to merge his State in the United State.
It was observed that jurisdiction being summary in nature, a seriously disputed question of title could be left to be decided by the civil court. Tribunal to try his objection as regards the non-compliance with the provision,-, of that section as a preliminary objection and determine whether the second respondent had complied with the provisions of s. The Central Government shall apply individual duties to imports from any exporter or producer not included in the examination who has provided the similar internet site [click through the next internet site] necessary information during the course of the investigation as referred to in the second proviso to sub-rule (3) of rule 17.
A careful reading of the regulations referred to supra make it abundantly clear that the land acquired shall be disposed off by the KIADB by inviting applications from the eligible applicants, notifying the availability of land, prescribing the manner of such disposal and fixing the last date for submitting applications and giving such particulars as it may consider absolutely necessary by publishing it in the newspapers having wide circulation in and outside the state of Karnataka.
117 and if not to dismiss his petition. The petitioners after the death of Mahabir, they continued to live in the joint family as members and till now members of the joint family. 5 and 12 have stated as follows: 5 and his two sisters, namely, Kusum and Bina were brought up and were maintained from click through the up coming web site income of the joint family properties. (1) SCC 168 if the levy is for the benefit of the entire industry, there is sufficient quid pro quo between the levy recovered and services rendered to the industry as a whole.
Article 3 of the Covenant provided for the constitution of a Council of Rulers one of the members of which was to be its President, such President being called the Rajpramukh. 58, 83 and 84 of 1956), and with R. The powers of the High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution, while issuing appropriate writs, are very wide. It also provided that the Ruler of Gwalior would be the first Raj Pramukh of the United State.
Dhebar, for the State of Bombay (respondent in Petition No. Such activities are clearly regulatory activities and the Board is empowered under Section 11(2)(k) to charge the required fee for the said purpose, and once it is held that the fee levied is also regulatory in nature then the requirement of quid pro quo recedes to the background and the same need not be confined to the contributories alone. Having regard therefore to the conclusion reached above in regard to the non-compliance with the provisions of s.
48 of 1958 is concerned, the difficulty which faces the appellant is that we 609 have nothing on the record of the appeal to show what were the exact terms of the deposit made by the second respondent under s. Varma (respondent in Petitions Nos. In Standard Chartered Bank (supra), scope of Section 111(7) was considered.