D-56 is the deposition of Jankiprasad in Civil Suit No. The same Jankiprasad, in Ex. The rule was framed by the Central Government by virtue of the authority vested in it under s. Physicians and nurses wear sterile clothing. The appeal of the company must therefore be allowed with respect to the remaining eleven workmen who have been ordered to be reinstated by the Appellate Tribunal. In that exhibit he stated advocate that the farkatnama was cancelled by him by notice to Govindprasad advocates and that he and Govindprasad continued to have common food.
If we do not place much reliance legal service on Ex. Further, the rice remained in raw form and in order law firm to make it edible it had to be cooked like any other cereal. 279 large extent of properties, and the fact that he had omitted some items of property would not establish that the said items were not joint family properties. 39 (2) gives statutory law firm recognition to the decisions in 8 C. In that case, the process undertaken was to remove the inedible portions of Pineapple together with its outer cover and then slice such Pineapple and can the same after adding sugar as a preservative.
The question whether or not there is a duty to act judicially must be decided (1) [1958] INSC 6; [1958] S. Pio Food Packers, (1980) 3 SCR 1271. It is important to note that the cans were sealed under high temperature and then put into boiling water for sterilization. We are not called upon to decide whether the profit and loss test is one which should be accepted; it is sufficient for our purpose to say that if such a test was not accepted by the Wage Board, the Wage Board was certainly far from wrong in doing so.
The discovery that heat, in the form of flame, steam, or hot water, kills bacteria made possible the advances of modern surgery, which is based on freedom from microorganisms, or asepsis, and prevention of contamination. The Labour and Industry Act, 1953, of Victoria (Australia) in s. 266, 289, 317, per Isaacs, J. The claim of the creditor, Kasturchand Daga, who sought to attach the trust property along with other family properties, was settled and some of the family properties were sold to him under Ex.
On the sale- deed, Govindprasad made the following endorsement: We may, however, make it clear that payment made pursuant to the order of this Court will not in any event be refundable or adjustable towards the future wages of those workmen who will be reinstated by the company. That section empowered the Central Government to make rules to carry out the purposes of the Act, in particular to provide for the procedure to be followed by the Board in fixing rates of wages.
P-24 in discharge of his claim. D- 1 1 is his assertion advocates that there was no partition in the family. The appeal of the workmen on the question of reinstatment fails and is hereby dismissed. It was held that the said product in its primary and essential character was sold in the market as rice only, despite the addition of dehydrated vegetables and certain spices. As a matter of fact, even before us attempts were made by the respondent, the Indian Federation of Working Journalists to demonstrate that the profit and loss accounts and the balance-sheets of several petitioners were manipulated and unreliable.
8958 of 2003), it was held that as the essential character of the product had not changed, there would be no manufacture. Therein he lawyer stated that the defendants were all brothers but were divided. D-49 and D- 11 show that the plaintiff was making -assertions to suit his purpose. ” The duty to act judicially may arise in widely differing circumstances which it would be impossible to attempt to define exhaustively. The order of the Appellate Tribunal will stand with respect to the four workmen named above in 161 view of the company’s willingness to take them back.
D-11, we should also, for the same reason, not place much value on the assertions made in Ex. P-80, asserted to the contrary. Australian Boot Trade Employees Federation v. Commissioner of Central Excise, New Delhi (Civil Appeal No. 20 of the Act and was a piece of delegated legislation which if the rules were laid before both the Houses of Parliament in accordance with s. Rule 8 provided that every question considered at a meeting of the Board was to be decided by a majority of the votes of the members present and 174 voting.
That question has to be considered on other evidence. In that case, the product was a combination of raw rice, dehydrated vegetables and spices in the name of rice and spice. In the event of equality of votes the Chairman was to have a casting vote. As we have already seen, the same test was applied in Tungabhadra case (supra) and in Deputy Commissioner of Sales Tax (Law), Board of Revenue (Taxes), Ernakulam v. Lala La But what is important in Ex. That was a suit filed by Kasturchand Daga against some of the brothers and, perhaps, Jankiprasad thought that it was necessary to assert separation so that some of the, family properties, other than those mortgaged, might be salvaged.
Sterilization of all equipment used during an operation, and of anything that in any way may touch the operative area, is carried out scrupulously in hospitals. This ground ignores the fact that the Working Journalists Wage Board Rules, 1956, which were published on July 31, 1956, were made by the Central Government in exercise of the power conferred upon it by s. This Rule therefore prescribed that the decision of the Board could be reached by a majority and this was the rule which was followed by the Board in arriving at its decision.