The competent authority, that is, the advocate Chandigarh Estate Officer passed an order of eviction in exercise of powers conferred on him under sub-section 1 of Section 5 of the 1971 Act, after rejecting all the contentions raised by the appellant. The appellant participated in the proceeding and after hearing commenced, he sought to go for arbitration, but the said legal service prayer was not accepted by the Estate Officer on the ground that the same was not permissible under the provisions of the 1971 Act.
Commissioner of Income-tax (2) where Bose, J. It is necessary, however, that every fact for and against the assessee must have been considered with due care and the Tribunal must have given best advocate in Chandigarh law firms its finding in a manner which would clearly indicate what were the questions which arose for determination, what was the evidence pro and contra in regard to each one of them and what were the findings reached on the top advocates in Chandigarh evidence before it. It is clear on the record that the appellant maintained its books of account according to the mercantile system and there were maintained in its cash books two accounts: one showing the cash balances from day to day and other known as ” Almirah account ” wherein ‘Were kept large balances which were not required for the day-to-day working of the business.
, said that the remarks of periodical monetary return must be confined to the facts of that case and it was held that money received from an insurance company for insurance against losses was income representing loss of profits as opposed to loss of capital. Even though the appellant kept large amounts in bank deposits and securities monies were required at short notice at different branches of the appellant. In a later case The Commissioner of Income-tax v. The conclusions reached by the Tribunal should not be coloured by any irrelevant considerations or matters of prejudice and if there are any circumstances which required to be explained by the assessee, the assessee should be given an opportunity of doing so.
This contention of the Banks was upheld by the Sastry Tribunal which said: 206 any of top lawyers in Chandigarh the Banks for any particular year, but the item merely referred to the question of bonus in general with special reference to qualifications for eligibility and method of payment. Admittedly, the Defendant-Seller was not served with a copy of the Memo and was not notified with regard to the alleged deposit. 370 of the Constitution of India to the State of Jammu Kashmir, the Yuvaraj became a constitutional monarch without any legislative authority or powers and (5) the decision of the best Chandigarh advocates Constituent Assembly of the State not to pay compensation was invalid since the Assembly itself was not properly constituted.
2008 in the Court of IInd Additional Civil Judge (Sr. After the decision of this Court, the Corporation terminated the dealership and intended to take back the possession from the dealer with a view to appoint another dealer as specifically permitted in the lease deed as well as in the dealership agreement. The appellant built a wall to stop the functioning of the retail outlet and refused to hand over the possession which constrained the Corporation to initiate a proceeding for eviction under the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971 (for short, the 1971 Act) as a valid lease deed existed between the appellant and the respondent, a public sector undertaking.
It was contended that (i) when Maharaja Hari Singh conveyed his powers to the Yuvaraj by his proclamation of June 20, 1949, he was himself a constitutional monarch and could convey no higher powers, (2) the said proclamation could not confer on the Yuvaraj the powers specified therein, (3) the powers of the Yuvaraj were substantially limited by his own proclamation issued on November 25, 1949, by which he sought to make applicable to his State the Constitution of India, that was soon to be adopted by its Constituent Assembly, in so far as it was applicable, (4) as a result of the application of certain specified Articles, including Art.
On no account whatever should the Tribunal base advocate in Chandigarh its findings on suspicions, conjectures or surmises nor should it act on no evidence at all or on improper rejection of material and relevant evidence or partly on evidence and partly on suspicions, conjectures and surmises and if it does anything of the sort, its findings even though on questions of fact will be liable to be set aside by this Court.
” It is in the light of these observations that we have to determine the question arising before us in the present appeals. (2) A person shall be eligible to be appointed as a Director of Prosecution or a Deputy Director of Prosecution, only if he has been in practice as an Chandigarh advocate for not less than ten years and such appointment shall be made with the concurrence of the Chief Justice of the High Court. The Defendant- Seller sold the property in question to Sri Rajesh on 20.
The validity of the Act was challenged mainly on the ground that Yuvaraj Karan Singh had no authority to promulgate the Act. 2007, under a registered sale deed. The Plaintiff-Buyer filed Execution Petition No. There is no cavil over the fact that the grant of dealership in favour of the appellant was cancelled by the Committee and that received the stamp of approval of this Court. After six years of participation in the said proceeding, he initiated a civil suit alleging illegality in termination of the lease and prayed that the proceedings under the 1971 Act to be kept in abeyance which was not accepted.