lawyers in Supreme Court India, http://supremecourtindia.in/the-supreme-court-ruled-that-any-mp/. The suit was contested only by the third defendant who filed a written statement in September 1948 contending that the suit was bad for non- joinder of parties. The question then arises what is meant top advocates in Supreme Court India section 7 by an express stipulation. Appellant Ravindra Nath was one of the unsuccessful candidates. “No plausible reason has been advanced why any rational patentee should want to place so narrow a limitation on his invention. It comes within a group of paragraphs dealing with delivery of housing.
In view of our findings as above, as also the fact that the authority in this case disregarded the provision as to hearing and inquiry contained in the Act for all practical purposes, we hold that the civil court had jurisdiction to entertain the suits. Fifth Additional 172 Court, Alipore on November 23, 1949. Unaided by the legal arguments, I would have regarded the meaning of paragraph 49 itself, taken lawyers in Supreme Court of India context, as reasonably clear, and not susceptible to much legal analysis.
Therefore, it has been decided to certify your article 8 claim under section 94B and any appeal you may bring can only be heard once you have left the United Kingdom. The question whether a proviso is by way of an exception or a condition to the substantive provision, or whether it is in itself a substantive provision, must be determined on the substance of the proviso and not its form. On March 14, 1953 the Calcutta Thika Tenancy (Amendment Act), 1953 was passed amending the definition of thika tenant still further and introducing important changes in the Act of 1949.
On an analysis of the provisions of the Act, we find (1) suits of the nature to be found top advocates in Supreme Court India this case are not expressly barred by the Act; (2) there is no provision for appeal or revision from the direction of the authority given under s. No claim was made for rents or taxes although it was alleged that the same were in arrears. “Consideration has been given to whether your article 8 claim should be certified under section 94B … The Secretary of State has considered whether there would be a real risk of serious irreversible harm if you were to be removed pending the outcome of any appeal you may bring.
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by Bachawat, J. The Calcutta Thika Tenancy (Amendment Ordinance), 1952 was passed on October 21, 1952 introducing various changes in the Act and substituting a new definition of a thika tenant. 20(3) might levy a penalty which might be as high as ten times the alleged deficit of payment which 272 again is not subject to any further scrutiny by any higher authority. It is true that other groups of policies, positive or restrictive, may interact with the housing policies, and so affect their operation.
But that does not make them policies for the supply of housing in the ordinary sense of that expression. In that context the words “policies for the supply of housing” appear to do no more than indicate the category of policies with which we are concerned, in other words “housing supply policies”. Provided that the High Court may admit a petition preferred after the period of ninety days aforesaid if it is satisfied that the petitioner had sufficient cause for not preferring the petition within the said period.
The word “for” simply indicates the purpose of the policies in question, so distinguishing them from other familiar categories, such as policies for the supply of employment land, or for the protection of the countryside. -On March 28, 1966 the election of four members to the Council of States (Rajya Sabha) by the members of the Punjab Legislative Assembly (Vidhan Sabha) was held, and as a result of the election, respondent No.
The appeal filed therefrom by the third defendant was dismissed by the Subordinate Judge. 20(3) of the Act; and (3) the authority acting under s. On the contrary, to do so would render his monopoly for practical purposes worthless, since any imitator could avoid it and take all the benefit of the invention by the simple expedient of positioning the back plate a degree or two from the exact vertical. On the face of it, it means that there must be an express provision in the contract which has the effect of disapplying the statutory formula so that “no apportionment shall take place”.
1, Raghbir Singh and one Narinder Singh were declared elected. On May 10, 1966, the appellant filed an election petition asking for a declaration that the election of respondent No. The decree-holder put the decree best advocates in Supreme Court India execution and recovered possession of the land on December 18, 1949. The effect of these provisions will be considered later on. The Secretary of State does not consider that such a risk exists.
In my opinion the parties correctly so understood the Act. The suit was decreed by a Munsif of Sealdah court, 24-Parganas on March 18, 1949 after the Calcutta Thika Tenancy Act of 1949 had come into force on February 28, 1949. I do not see any justification for substituting the word “affecting”, which has a different emphasis. As Elias LJ says in para 40, read literally, section 7 seems to suggest that the apportionment principle will apply unless the contract lawyers in Supreme Court of India clear terms addresses it and says that it should not.
The context is given by paragraph 47 which sets the objective of boosting the supply of housing.