best advocates in Supreme Court India, http://supremecourtindia.in/india-supreme-court-overturns-ban-on-women-at-sabarimala-temple/. 348, The Baualkot Cement Co. But we have seen that in the context of Art. Counsel for the plaintiff top advocates in Supreme Court India this Court did not press for acceptance of this somewhat audacious claim and conceded that the right which the plaintiff merely claimed, notwithstanding the unguarded phraseology used in the plaint, was that: The plea apparently was that all tenants within the Banskati Mahal had the right to quarry and remove limestone and manufacture lime from all the limestone quarries and Hills within the Mahal and to carry on trade therein.
(ii) The Standing Orders Act which has for its object, the defining with sufficient precision. As we have pointed out, the High Court felt difficulty in dealing with the question because neither the Panchayat Samiti nor the Standing Committee had found sufficient facts to enable it to deal with the question. 4 was arbitrary and destructive of the right of appeal and therefore ultra vires. But there is no warrant for holding that merely because the Standing Orders Act is a selfcontained statute with regard to the matters mentioned therein, the jurisdiction of the Industrial Tribunal under the Act.
6 of 1955 shows that it was passed to make provision for the speedy acquisition of lands necessary for works or other development measures connection with flood or prevention of erosion. 5(a)(iv) and therefore there is an overall limit of indemnity of £3m. referred to a labour court. ” The effect of the Constitution (Fourth Amendment) Act is that a deprivation of property short of transfer of the ownership or the right to possession of any property to the State is not within the purview of cl.
It is convenient at this stage to refer to the provisions of the impugned Acts. A top law firms in Supreme Court India made after the Constitution (Fourth Amendment) Act providing for destruction of property or impairment of its value is not invalid because it does not provide for payment of compensation. 222 The only point that remains is whether the Company brought tea into the octroi limits of the Panchayat for consumption, use or sale, therein.
The trustees’ primary case is that none of the investors’ claims fall to be aggregated with those of any other investor. The learned counsel for the Panchayat contends that these things are done and that the resultant product is completely different from the tea imported into octroi limits. Sen says that he is willing to take the facts as stated at the bar by the learned counsel for the appellant. But we consider that it is an unsatisfactory way of dealing with questions of fact.
[595B-D] Guest, Keen, Williams. 2(k) of the Industrial Disputes Act, and if such a dispute is referred by the Government concerned for adjudication the Industrial Tribunal or Labour Court as the case may be will have jurisdiction to adjudicate upon the same. It was also the insurers’ alternative case that the claims could be aggregated by reference to the two developments. to adjudicate upon the matters covered by the standing orders, has been in any manner abridged or taken away, It will always be open in a proper case, for the union or workmen to raise an ‘industrial dispute’ as that expression is defined in s.
124(5) of the Act to be filed within 60 days of the publication of the notice under s. Section 3 gives power to the State Government to acquire land for those purposes by an order best lawyers in Supreme Court of India writing. 5 in requiring all appeals under a. If that argument fails, their secondary case is that the Peninsula Village claims and the Marrakech claims cannot be aggregated with one another and so there are two available pots of indemnity. 319 top advocates in Supreme Court India the plained it was it was claimed that by immemorial customs and usage, the tenants in the Banskati Mahal had a right to quarry and remove limestone and manufacture lime from the quarries and hills within the Mahal.
Sterling, [1959] INSC 87; [1960] 1 S. In the circumstances we must also decline to deal with this point. The preamble to Act No. Before this question can be dealt with satisfactorily, all the relevant facts must be found by the Standing Committee, It is true that the Standing Committee inspected the premises of the Company but in their order they have given very scanty facts, They do not say whether the tea is crushed, processed or treated chemically to convert it into a marketable commodity.
It is also not quite clear whether the tea which is imported by the Company is known in trade circles as a different commodity from the tea actually sent out in boxes. Where a law firms in Supreme Court India does not provide for the transfer of the ownership or right to possession of any property to the State or to a corporation owned or Controlled by the State, it shall not be deemed to provide for the compulsory acquisition or requisitioning of property, notwithstanding that it deprives any person of his property.
The Panchayat appealed to this Court. The insurers’ case is that the investors’ claims against the solicitors all arise from “similar acts or omissions in a series of related matters or transactions” within the meaning of clause 2. the conditions of employment, under the industrial establishments and to make the said conditions known to the workmen, has provided more or less a speedy remedy to the workmen, for the purpose of having a standing order modified or for having any question relating to the application, or interpretation of a standing order.