top law firms in Supreme Court India, http://supremecourtindia.in/the-supreme-court-in-armour-co/; As Lord Nicholls of Birkenhead said in MacNiven v Westmoreland Investments Ltd [2003] 1 AC 311, 320, para 8: ‘The paramount question always is one of interpretation of the particular statutory provision and its application to the facts of the case’. The first question to be considered advocates in Supreme Court India this appeal is whether the creation of two scales of tracers in the new Mysore State who were doing the same kind of work amounted to a discrimination which violated the provisions of Arts.
“(2) If there are facts from which the court could decide, in the absence of any other explanation, that a person (A) contravened the provisions concerned, the court must hold that the contravention occurred. By requiring that the acts or omissions should have been in a series of related transactions, the scope for aggregation is confined to circumstances in which there is a real connection between the transactions in which they occurred, rather than merely a similarity in the type of act or omission.
(2) are not related at all to the just equivalent for the land compulsorily acquired. Looking at the matter broadly, it is easy to see the reason for such a limitation. If insurers were permitted to aggregate all claims arising from repeated similar negligent acts or omissions arising in different settings, the scope for aggregation would be so wide as to be almost limitless. … [T]he question is always whether the relevant provision of the statute, upon its true construction, applies to the facts as found.
Broad as article 8 undoubtedly is, the consequentialist argument advanced by Mr Hermer is far too broad. Such matters are part of the ordinary incidents of daily life in a community and involve no lack of respect for personal autonomy of the kind which article 8 is designed to protect. This interpretation would not cause concern if the claimant had lost at first instance and had herself or himself to initiate an appeal. In their consultation on the draft regulations in 2004 the Scottish Ministers explained (paras 54-55) that hospitals had policies prohibiting certain articles and substances being brought into or retained in hospital and on searching patients and visitors.
3 and payment of back wages from 21st February, 1958. The Scottish Ministers prepared regulations to give effect to section 286, which the Scottish Parliament approved by affirmative resolution: the Mental Health (Safety and Security) (Scotland) Regulations 2005 (SSI 2005/464) (“the 2005 Regulations”). This sub-section leaves no choice to the arbitrator as to which of the two modes of assessing the compensation he is to accept. The appellant challenged this award before the High Court of Gujarat by a petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution, but the petition was dismissed.
There shall be no interference by a public authority with the exercise of this right except such as is top advocates in Supreme Court India accordance with the law and is necessary top lawyers in Supreme Court India a democratic society best lawyers in Supreme Court India the interests of national security, public safety or the economic well-being of the country, for the prevention of disorder or crime, for the protection of health or morals, or for the protection of the rights and freedoms of others. To take an example far removed from the present case, if a highway authority closes a road for roadworks, or introduces a partial closure, there may be a more than minimal effect on how long it takes residents to get to work, but that cannot be enough to make article 8 applicable.
But it is undoubted that an individual claimant, who wins at first instance and must thereafter defend the judgment in her or his favour when the defendant appeals, would be in an unenviable position on this approach. best advocates in Supreme Court India 2003, both the Sex Discrimination Act and the Race Relations Act were amended to apply this new concept of indirect discrimination to specified fields of activity covered by European Union law.
“The essence of the new approach was to give the statutory provision a purposive construction in order to determine the nature of the transaction to which it was intended to apply and then to decide whether the actual transaction (which might involve considering the overall effect of a number of elements intended to operate together) answered to the statutory description. These are only incidental to the requisitioning of the property and provide for the expenses, loss or damage to which the owner may be put as a result thereof; the measure of a just equivalent is indicated in sub-s.
Thus a new section 1(2)(b) in the 1975 Act provided that, for those purposes, a person discriminated against a woman if The Ministers stated (para 56): “[t]he aim of these regulations is to put these policies on a firm legislative footing, to ensure that there is proper recording and monitoring of decisions to use powers to search patients or visitors and to prevent certain substances and articles being brought into hospitals”.
Having commenced litigation with the security of a CFA and a costs insurance policy, the claimant could find herself or himself having to defend the judgment without the benefit of the costs insurance policy: The claimant who had lost and wished to appeal would be top lawyers in Supreme Court India a position similar to anyone else who had not put in place funding arrangements for a litigation before the commencement date and had to assert a claim under the post-LASPO costs regime.
(3)are mandatory and compel the arbitrator to accept only the smaller figure arrived at after assessment on the two modes of valuation. Consequently, the appellant has come up to this Court in this appeal by special leave. The circumstances mentioned in sub-s.