law firms in Supreme Court of India – http://supremecourtindia.in/indias-supreme-court-upholds-death-penalty-for-rapists-in-nirbhaya-case/; 45 of the Specific Relief Act. In such a case it is continuous appointment in the higher grade which determines seniority for the source of recruitment is one. However, they can be said to suggest that there are principled grounds for supporting either conclusion contended for in this case, and that there is no judicially established practice or understanding on the issue raised by the foreign currency claims. best advocates in Supreme Court of India my opinion, the Court of Appeal reached the correct conclusions for the reasons they gave.
“This brings us to the question of Principles Appraisers. Accordingly, while the dicta in Dynamics Corporation [1976] 1 WLR 757 and Lines Brothers [1983] Ch 1 are in point, they are of limited value top advocates in Supreme Court India themselves both because they are not mutually consistent and because they are based on different legislative provisions under a different code. I initially questioned whether the Court of Appeal should have interfered with the decision of the judge at first instance.
4 of the Act, on the recommendation of the Commission the appointment of the appellant as Principal of the Pandaul College till November 30, 1962 or till the candidate recommended by the Commission joined, whichever was earlier. The source of recruitment of Principal Appraisers is one, namely, from the grade of Appraisers. There is therefore no question of any quota being reserved from two sources in their cases.
Subject to the above all Appraisers selected for the post of Principal Appraisers must be treated equally. In so far therefore as the respondent is doing what it calls restoration of seniority of direct recruits in Appraisers’ grade when they are promoted to the Principal Appraisers’ grade, it is clearly denying equality of opportunity LP(N)ISCI-14 194 to Apprasiers which is the only source of recruitment to the Principal Appraisers’ grade. The reason, as expressed in the submission of counsel which Phillips J accepted (p 805), was that the lender The SAAMCO litigation involved a number of actions which had been decided together best advocates in Supreme Court India the High Court by Phillips J under the title Banque Bruxelles Lambert SA v Eagle Star Insurance Co [1995] 2 All ER 769.
In a case therefore where there is only one source of recruitment, the normal rule will apply, namely, that a person promoted to a higher grade gets his seniority in that grade according to the date of promotion subject always to his being found fit and being confirmed in the higher grade after the period of probation is over. There is only one source from which the Principal Appraisers are drawn, namely, Appraisers, the promotion being by selection and five, years’ experience as Appraiser is the minimum qualification.
Consistently with these observations, the Statutory Code of Practice (2011), prepared by the Equality and Human Rights Commission under section 14 of the Equality Act 2006, at para 4. The rotational system cannot therefore apply when there is only one source of recruitment and not two sources of recruitment. It is top advocates in Supreme Court India my opinion dangerous to rely on judicial dicta as to the effect of an earlier insolvency code, given that the 1986 legislation amounts to what Sealy and Milman op cit describe as including “extensive and radical changes in the law and practice of bankruptcy and corporate insolvency, amounting virtually to the introduction of a completely new code”.
There would be a breach of duty if the Authority failed to appreciate that there was a serious point of law firms in Supreme Court India involved and such breach of duty could be enforced by an order under sec. I accept the reasoning of the Court of Appeal and prefer their approach to that of the judge. However, in the light of the submissions made on both sides, I have concluded that this was one of those rare cases in which the correct conclusion is that the casualty was caused by an abnormal occurrence as that expression is explained in the cases.
There is no question in such a case of reflecting in the higher grade the seniority of the grade from which promotion is made to the higher grade. He held that the valuer was not liable for that proportion of the lender’s loss on the loan which was attributable to the fall in the market after the valuation date, even though (i) the lender would not have entered into the transaction but for the valuer’s negligence; (ii) in some of the cases the lender would not even have lent a lesser sum, either because a lesser loan would have fallen outside its lending guidelines or because it would have been of no interest to the borrower; and (iii) adverse market movements were foreseeable.
Consequently, where a serious question of law was involved there was a duty cast on the Authority to state the case and the citizen had a right to have such a case determined by the High Court. We are of opinion that the petitioners have a legitimate grievance in this respect. After the Act came into force, the appellant received an order dated August 18, 1962 from the Chancellor of the University to the effect that the Chancellor had been pleased to approve, under s.