The position of the copper legal services trade at legal services in Chandigarh top Chandigarh legal the end of March, 1958, within two days of which the impugned order was made is fairly clear. How the relation between the units will be judged must depend on the law firms facts top Chandigarh law firm proved, having regard to the scheme and object of the statute which gives the right of unemployment compensation and also prescribes disqualification therefor. Another illustration of the same rule is to be found in the case of The best Chandigarh advocates Balgownie Land Trust, Ltd. Copper is so largely required by the industries in India for Chandigarh lawyers producing various consumer’s goods and also sheets and other articles which are needed as raw material in other industries that the position that it is an essential commodity cannot be and has law firms not been disputed.
Often, too, it happens that, though the proof-reader does not feel justified in himself making a correction, he takes other action. If in their true relation they constitute one integrated whole, we say 717 that the establishment is one; if on the contrary they do not constitute one integrated whole, each unit is then a separate unit. Thus, in one lawyer in Chandigarh case the unity of ownership, management and control may be the important test; It is, perhaps, impossible to lay down any one test as an absolute and invariable test for all cases.
We are thus left with four items, which were disallowed by the Tribunal. June Chaudhary, learned senior counsel appearing for State, resisting the aforesaid arguments, contended that there is no reason to discard the dying declaration as there is no infirmity in the same. ” The Court shall presume to be genuine every document purporting to be a certificate. In either case it is important that the matter shall be queried and passed back to editorial authority. Learned counsel for the respondents appearing before us has stated that the claim with respect to items (iv) and (v) was conceded by the workmen before the Tribunal and it seems that by over-sight these items were not excluded by it.
Learned senior counsel for the State would further submit that though the charge has not been framed under Section 149 of the IPC, there is no bar, regard being had to the evidence on record, to convict the accused-appellants with the aid of the said provision. The real purpose of these tests is to find out the true relation between the parts, branches, units etc. The reason given by the Tribunal for disallowing these items was that they formed part of the profits earned in the course of the company’s business and there was no good reason for deducting them from the profits.
which is by law declared to be admissible as evidence of any particular fact, and which purports to be duly certified by any officer -of the Central Government or of a State Government. Dongray ,and the findings of the Tribunal thereon. 862 on behalf of the assessee that it was essential to the idea of trade that there should be a continuous series of trading operations. He may spot a libel, or think he has. It is canvassed by her that it is not a case for conversion of the offence, for it is squarely a case under Section 302 IPC and not under Section 304 Part I or Part II of the IPC.
The Court rightly pointed out that the question was not whether it was a trade but ` Whether it was a venture in the nature of trade. Having taken note of the submission of the learned counsel for the appellants, all that we wish to observe is that in case if any of the appellants apply for allotment of any land/shop/space to TTD for doing any business in the area under their ownership or/and control then the TTD would be at liberty and may consider their case for providing them a shop or land or space, as the case may be, pursuant to any of their scheme, if any in force, on suitable terms and conditions alike others as a fine gesture on the part of the TTD, for compliance.
Hence, though the single transaction of purchase and sale, may not have amounted to what is ordinarily understood by trade in the sense of a series of transactions, it was certainly a venture in the nature of trade, because from the very beginning, the intention was manifest that the purchase was made not with a view to utilizing the commodity for the personal use of the purchaser, but with a view to making profit by a resale, which was apparent from the very nature and magnitude of the commodity purchased.
Held, further that sanction under s 34(1) of the Act would be good if it was proved by evidence that it had been granted after all the necessary facts had been placed before the sanctioning authority though the facts were not stated on the face of the sanction itself. It further went on to say that as regards income earned by way of rent, light and power it was not disputed that expenditure in respect of buildings from which the rent was derived, such as on repairs and maintenance, is included in the expenditure side of the account, and taxes and rates for these buildings were paid by the company.
He fairly concedes that these two items may be excluded from consideration in making calculations for arriving at the available surplus. It is further urged by her that the testimony of all the witnesses are credible and the contention that PW-2 and PW-3 are chance witnesses does not deserve any acceptance. If he thinks there is a mistake but is not sure, he must query the -proof so that the editorial staff may decide.