Get the address of Best Lawyer in Chandigarh +919876616815

In the Letters Patent appeal preferred by the company against this decision a preliminary objection was raised on behalf of the Union representing the workmen that the Allahabad High Court could not call for the records and quash the order of the Labour Appellate Tribunal of India as those records were legal in Chandigarh Calcutta and consequently beyond the reach of the Court. Further, the context of this paragraph is that a literal meaning has to be given to a charging Section in a tax statute.

legal services in chandigarhThe effect of such installation of such heavy equipments like generator sets on the terrace is not only dangerous but would also make it impossible for the appellant as well as the surrounding neighboring residents to live peacefully. Being however, of opinion that there top Chandigarh law firm had been undue delay in making this application for a writ, he dismissed the petition on that ground. It means that the charges or costs lawyer in Chandigarh described in clauses (a), (b) and (c) are not to be included in the value of imported goods subject to satisfying the requirement of the proviso that the charges were distinguishable from the price actually paid or payable for the imported goods.

It was, thus, contended that in no case the assessee was under any obligation to pay the duty on the aforesaid process. This part of the Interpretative Note cannot be so read as to mean that those charges which are not covered in clauses (a) to (c) are available to be included top advocates in Chandigarh the value of the imported goods. However, in TISCO [(2000) 3 SCC 472] this Court took note of Interpretative Note to Rule 4 and held: (SCC p.

19 (2) it cannot be upheld. When it comes to machinery provisions in tax statutes and provisions which provide for appeals and the limitation period within which such appeals have to be filed, it is clear that the aforesaid observations would have no application whatsoever. The defence putforth by the assessee to the show cause notice issued by the Additional Commissioner was that the aforesaid process does not amount to `manufacture’ within the meaning of Section 2(f) of the Central Excise Act, 1944.

This dispute was referred by the Government of Bombay for adjudication before the Industrial Tribunal under s. 19 (1) (a) does not fall within the four corners of Art. 5(a) was maintainable and the Appellate Tribunal had erred in holding otherwise. Any such application(s) will be undoubtedly considered on its merit(s). ” If any limitation on the exercise of the fundamental right under Art. Any such application if made to the Special Court shall be allowed.

” Nothing in sub-clause (a) of clause (1) shall Chandigarh advocates affect the operation of any existing law, or prevent the advocates State from making any law, in so far as such law imposes reasonable restrictions on the exercise of the right conferred by the said sub-clause in the interests of the security of the State, friendly relations with foreign States, public order, decency or morality, or in relation to contempt of court, defamation or incitement to an offence. It is further contended that the appellant is living on the second floor of the building and enough damage has been done to the same and cracks have occurred therein due to the installation of heavy equipments including generator sets.

10(1)(d) of the Industrial Disputes Act XIV of 1947. That Heading applies to products of the milling industry, including flours, groats, meal and grains of cereals, and flour, meal or flakes of vegetables on which nil duty is payable. This demand consisted of three parts, (a) one month’s privilege leave with full salary and dearness allowance on completion of eleven months best Chandigarh legal service in a year with a right to accumulate upto six months, (b) one month’s sick leave with full salary and dearness allowance for each year of service with right to accumulate for the entire period of service, and (c) every workman should be entitled to take leave in proportion to the number of days he is in service of the company at the time of his application for the same.

(2) If in any such case any private person instructs a pleader to prosecute any person in any Court, the Public Prosecutor or Assistant Public Prosecutor in charge of the case shall conduct the prosecution, and the pleader so instructed shall act therein under the directions of the Public Prosecutor or Assistant Public Prosecutor, and may, with the permission of the Court, submit written argument after the evidence is closed in the case”.

law firm482, para 17) “The part of the Interpretative Note to Rule 4 relied on by the Tribunal has been couched in a negative form and is accompanied by a proviso. The said dispute related to a single demand made by the respondents with regard to leave. It was also argued that, in any case, the product was not classifiable under Heading 2108 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 as claimed by the Revenue but it should be covered under Heading 11. We do not see how this judgment furthers the argument of Shri Sanghi.

The Public Prosecutor will also be at liberty to apply that action in perjury to be taken against some or all such witnesses. This is only reiteration of the classic statement of best Chandigarh law firms contained in the Cape Brandy Syndicate case.