The tribunal has taken the income of the deceased-Ravi at Rs. 75,000/- per annum and deducting 1/3rd towards the personal expenses of the deceased, the tribunal calculated the loss of dependncy at Rs. 14 of the Constitution, we find that s. The witness deposed that the testator eventually had to cancel the power of attorney as the appellant was found indulging in interpolation of tenancies without his consent and with malafide intention misappropriated his properties. Ramesh Kumar, RW 2 Mr.
Thereby, the testator had also authorized the appellant to prepare documents with regard to the properties which he intended to sell from time to time. 14 of the Constitution. 6, 7 and 8 the constitution of the Board for religious trusts other than Jain religious trusts differs in material particulars from the constitution of the two Boards for Jain religious trusts. The High Court has also held that s.
9 of the Specific Relief Act, or, in any case from November, 1922 when, in execution of the decree passed in the said’ suit, the appellants were driven out of the temple precincts by the trustees. 10,000/- towards loss of love and affection, Rs. n(6) The judgment of Uttrakhand High Court rendered in the case of Queens Educational Society (supra) and the connected matters, is not applicable to cases fall within the provision of Section 10(23C)(vi) of the Act.
Nathu Singh had a host of grand children was also stated by this witness. Adhiyhaman Education , (1995) 4 SCC 104, this Court noticed that Entry 66 of List I of the Seventh Schedule has visit the following internet page – Highly recommended Online site, remained unchanged from the inception and that Entry 11 was taken out from List II and was amalgamated with Entry 25 of List III. In the said case the Court held as follows In State of Tamil Nadu and another vs. 19(1)(f) of the Constitution, also. 10,000/- towards loss of estate and Rs. It is further pointed out that under ss.
It is pointed out that the definition of the word ‘ Hindu’ in s. In addition to this, the tribunal awarded conventional damages of Rs. The provisions of Art. 5 constitutes a Board for religious trusts other than Jain religious trusts, and also two separate Boards-one for Swetambar Jain religious trusts and the other for Digambar Jain religious trusts. He stated further that at the time of his death, the testator was aged ninety years.
But further down on the same page his Lordship she said (go right here):- Any way, article 32 of the Constitution gives us very wide discretion in the matter of framing our writs to suit the exigencies of particular cases, and the application of the petitioner cannot be thrown out simply on the ground that the proper writ or direction has not been prayed for “. He mentioned in particular that the testator had a very cordial relationship with the children till he died so much so that they along with the grand children used to congregate on all family functions.
Narayan Singh Saini, son of the testator deposed that his(testator) family comprised of his wife, Smt. 4 and 7 discussed above, with reference to the test under Art. He averred that the testator had appointed the appellant as his attorney for collecting rent from his tenants. 1,00,000/- towards medical expenses as against the claim of Rs. The submission is that there is inequality of treatment as between Hindu religious trusts on one hand and Sikh religious trusts on the other, the latter having been excluded from visit the following internet page purview of the Act; secondly, there is inequality of treatment even as between Hindu religious trusts and Jain religious trusts, though both come under the Act.
Thus, the tribunal has awarded total compensation of Rs. 2, 5, 6, 7 and 8 infringe Art. We do not 571 think that there is any substance in this contention. Ramesh Chander Sharma being not of any determinative significance is not being referred to. 120 of the Limitation Act, and, according to its findings, limitation began to run against the appellants either from September 12, 1922, when the trustees filed their suit under s.
5(A) is also equally objectionable because it imposes unreasonable restrictions on the rights to hold property, safeguarded by Art. 10,000/- towards loss of consortium, Rs. 8 of the judgment, and the judgment of Allahabad High Court rendered in the case of City Montessori School (supra) lays down please click the following internet site correct law. The first contention is that the provisions in ss. 265 beyond its jurisdiction”. He reiterated that the Will in question was deceitfully inserted amongst other documents to procure the signature of the testator.
19(1)(f) of the Constitution. We proceed now to consider the contentions urged on behalf of the appellants. Chanderwati, three sons and three daughters. 14 of the go to this site (Highly recommended Online site) Constitution had come up for discussion before this Court in a number of earlier cases (see here now the cases referred to in Shri Ram Krishna Dalmia v. 7(2) of the Act should be confined to that property which the probate enables him to administer” (1). 23 can have no application to the present case. 50,000/- x 13) towards loss of dependency.
Section 5(A) declares that the Government is competent to make a provisional assessment of the basic tax payable by the holder of unsurveyed land. 2 does riot include Sikhs; and s. And they held that “the general expressions which import the contrary ought to receive the qualification for which the appellant contends, and that the statement of personal property to be made by the executor under s. The testimony of RW 1 Mr.
There are various reasons, which have been discussed in para 8. The provisions of the Act are unconstitutional viewed from the angle of the provisions of Art. Apart from the provisions of ss. 5,000/- towards funeral expenses) and Rs. He stated that during the life time of the testator, he had executed three separate gift deeds conveying property to each of his sons. Taking the age of the deceased as 46 years, the tribunal adopted multiplier 13 and awarded compensation of Rs.