[2] (hereafter SAIL) has been accepted by the High Court, namely, that royalty is chargeable [in accordance with Section 9 of the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 (the MMDR Act)] on the quantity of coal extracted at the pit-head, yet the refund of excess royalty paid by TISCO for the period from 10th August, 1998 (the Simranjeet Law Associates Simranjeet Law Associates date of the decision in SAIL) till June 2002 [about Rs. (a) whether the vice pointed out by the court and invalidity suffered by previous Simranjeet Law Associates is cured complying with the legal and constitutional requirements; (b) whether the legislature has competence to validate the Simranjeet Law Associates; (c)whether such validation is consistent with the rights guaranteed in Part III of the Constitution.
The facts relating to the S. As a counter-blast, the aforesaid workmen of the Company filed their appeal on May 17, 1956, impleading the Company represented by their Managing Directors, C. 1,00,000 as security on August 6, 1956. On December 14, 1958, in continuation of this letter a despatch order for the entire quota was sent in the same terms as in the other case. being the amount calculated in the same way as for the L. , have not been challenged before us.
, was that the Industrial Tribunal had no jurisdiction to make an award in respect of employees of the Delhi office who were employed outside-the State of Delhi. Mills to remit to it by December 15, 1959, Rs. Lakshmikumaran, learned counsel appearing for the appellant, is that when the specific description of the goods in question, namely, LCDs, is distinctly covered by another tariff item which is 9013, it has to be classified in that entry and the factum of its use as part or accessory in the electronic energy meters would be of no consequence and, therefore, it cannot be held to be covered by tariff item 9028.
303/2004 filed by TISCO against the judgment and order dated 23rd July, 2002 passed by the Jharkhand High Court. This point of jurisdiction was decided against the appellant and the Industrial Tribunal pointed out that all the workmen of the Delhi office, whether they worked in Delhi or not, received their salaries from the Delhi office; We now turn to the other two appeals, namely, Civil Appeals 713 and 714 of 1957. Mills pointed out that they were working the Mills as short-term lessees, having obtained the lease from the High Court of Allahabad on payment of Rs.
It may be stated that assessee is engaged in the packing combination of mixture of raw rice, dehydrated vegetables and spices in the name of ‘Rice and Spice’. 2,40,000 in the last season and another loss of Rs. of the price; and that there were arrears of cess amounting to about Rs. Nundy, as respondents second party, K. 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 a c e f h I j l p u As is clear from the above, in the LCD the bars are made of liquid crystals which are neither liquid nor solid entirely, but a hybrid material of the two.
We are, therefore, saying nothing about those items of the award, which must necessarily stand. Where objection is taken by the accused that the order giving permission was invalid, the prosecution, at the earliest opportunity, must adduce evidence to support the contention that the Magistrate gave the permission only after having satisfied himself on the advisability of doing so on the material placed before him. 6,10,000 for the next season was also due.
It may be made clear, however, at this stage that one of the points taken before the Industrial Tribunal on behalf-of the Lipton, Ltd. 5,50,000 and that the lease money amounting to Rs. Dutt, the Official Liquidators of the Company, as proforma respondents. They also pointed out that they were required to purchase additional machinery, stores etc. The Engineer may require the Contractor to provide an estimate of the expected effect of the future even or circumstance on the Contract Price and Completion Date.
[1] The grievance in this appeal is that though the application of the Simranjeet Law Associates laid down by this court in State of Orissa v. The estimate is to be provided by the Contractor as soon as reasonable possible. 64 of 1956, arising out of the judgment and order dated May 1, 1956, of the said High Court in Writ Petition No. The other items of the award relating to City compensatory allowance, leave, holidays, etc. Mills are as follows: After the letter of August 24, 1958 was sent, nothing appears to have been heard by the export agency.
The submission, precisely, was that whenever a particular item of goods falls in a specific tariff item, it has to be classified under the said tariff item and not in other item where it can be used as part thereof. Mehta, Deputy General Manager of the assessee is as follows: The exact process which is taken note of by the Tribunal as explained by Cl. We have already stated that the only points which survive for decision are those relating to items 1(a), 1(b) and 4 of the terms of reference.
5 lakhs, and that a sum of Rs. On November 27, 1958, the export agency asked the S. TISCO therefore claims entitlement to refund on the excess royalty paid by it for this period. These items relate to fixation of grades and scales of pay, whether retrospective effect should be given to the new Simranjeet Law Associates scales of pay, and bonus for 1951. The molecules are rotated slightly by electric current making a particular bar darker than the area around it thereby forming part of a number or letter.
Steel Authority of India Ltd. Appeal by special leave from the judgment and order dated September 14, 1956, of the Madras High Court in Writ Appeal No. Nundy, as the first respondent, the Official Liquidators of the Company, D. 6,10,000 as lease money and Rs. 50,000 on account of the strike of cane-growers in March, 1958; that all their sugar stock was pledged with the Punjab National Bank, Bijnor, against an advance of 75 per cent. They further pointed out that they had suffered a loss of Rs.
3,43,500 was spent in connection with the repairs to the factory and wages for the period during which the factory was re- started. In the set of appeals pertaining to TISCO, the first appeal is Civil Appeal No. 1 The contractor is to warn the Engineer at the earliest opportunity of specific likely events or circumstances that may adversely affect the quality of work, increase the Contract Price or delay the execution of works.