He had also submitted a claim in the name of his wife Surjit who was also arrested. Subsequently, suspicions of the Government of Burma were aroused concerning the many cliams made on it and it was discovered that many of them, including some of those of Satwant Singh, were false. The higher price, it seems to us, is occasioned only because of the labour put into making the fruit more readily consumable and because of the cane employed to contain it. In this site case, the assessment admittedly had not earned any profits from the export of the Marine products.
The deduction permissible under Section 80HHC is only a deduction of the profits of the assessee from visit the following page export of the goods or merchandise. The comment applies fully in the case before us. In other words, the appellants are being rendered oustees in order to accommodate other oustees. Satwant Singh was arrested on the 12th of April, 1944, at Ambala and was taken to Lahore. A police investigation followed which revealed that a large number of claims made by various persons including Satwant Singh in respect of works done for the benefit of the army were false.
Such a patently unjust and unfair action cannot, by any stretch of imagination, be termed as ‘public purpose’ as grave harm, loss and injustice is being caused to the appellants for no sustainable reason Gupta concluded his arguments with the submission that such an acquisition was not at all necessary, apart from being illegal, unfair, unjust and against the principles of natural justice as the appellants are being ousted from their land in order to accommodate, adjust and rehabilitate others who are similarly situated as the appellants.
It is said that pineapple slices appeal to a different sector of the trade and that when a customer asks for a cane of pineapple slices he had in mind something very different from fresh pineapple fruit. 1,62,123 with interest as compensation for the non-delivery of the goods entrusted to the said Railway, and, as the demand was not complied with, he filed a suit against the Dominion of India in the Court of the Senior Subordinate Judge, Delhi, for recovery of the said amount.
you could check here again, the distinction in the mind of the consumer arises not from any difference in the essential identity of the two, but is derived from the mere form in which the fruit is desired. On the other hand, it had suffered a loss. In view publisher site of the above mentioned decisions of this Court, we hold that the findings and reasons recorded by both the learned single Judge and the Division Bench of the High Court that it is not public interest litigation is contrary to the law laid down by mouse click the next site Constitution Bench of this Court and other decisions referred to supra.
Nothing in law prevented the High Court from finding that the unlawful assembly consisted of the four convicted persons and some unidentified persons, who together numbered more than five. That does not, however, conclude the matter. The clause, truly Read Much more (visit the next website), speaks of goods consumed in the manufacture of other goods for sale or goods consumed in the manufacture of other goods for purposes other than sale. Only a few articles, fifteen in number and weighing about 61 maunds, were offered to him subject to the condition of payment of Rs.
Although a degree of processing is involved in preparing pineapple slices from the original fruit, the commodity continues to possess its original identity, notwithstanding the removal of inedible portions, the slicing and thereafter canning it on adding sugar to preserve it. It is contended for the Revenue that pineapple slices have a higher price in the market than the original fruit and that implies that the slices constitute a different commercial commodity.
By the very terms of Section 80HHC, it is clear that the assessee was not entitled to any benefit thereunder in the absence of any profits. After further correspondence, the respondent made a claim against simply click the following article Forwarding Railway in a sum of Rs. The said reasoning is liable what is it worth (Highly recommended Site) to be set aside, accordingly it is set aside. Krishan Lal, Assistant Claims Inspector, and take delivery of the goods. It is not as if the higher price is claimed because it is a different commercially commodity.
There is a fallacy in the submission. Learned counsel for the Revenue contends that even if no manufacturing process involved, the case still falls within Section 5(1)(a) of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, because the statutory provision speaks not only of goods consumed in the manufacture of other goods for sale but also via (Highly recommended Site) goods consumed otherwise. The Land Acquisition Collector is required to submit his report and the recommendations to the State Government along with the record of proceedings to enable the latter to take final call on the desirability, propriety and justification for the acquisition of the particular parcel(s) of land Henderson was arrested at lmphal and brought to Lahore for interrogation.
On July 24, 1948, the respondent was asked to contact one Mr. 1,067-8 0 on account of freight, and the respondent refused to take delivery of them.