In Umaji Keshao Meshram case (supra) it was clearly held that 2008 he was produced in Parbhani case on 11. It is only on the happening of both the events, such a person becomes disqualified. Sibal, learned senior counsel then relied upon the decision reported in Chandigarh advocates Ambica Quarry Works (supra) to repel the submission made on behalf of the first respondent that the non-grant of approval under Section 2 of the Forest Act, 1980 will be of no consequence as the continued existence of the lease which was granted prior to coming into force of the Forest Act, 1980 and it came to be renewed in the year 1983 after the Forest Act came into force.
2008 and supplementary charge-sheet was filed against best Chandigarh legal service him on 13. nWe have heard learned counsel for the parties. The contention was that though A-7 was implicated both in Parbhani and Jalna such implication was not in pursuance of his role as a member of an ‘organized crime syndicate’ pertaining to Malegaon bomb blast nor was the position that the gang involved in Malegaon blast was also responsible for the bomb blast in Parbhani and Jalna.
But there is nothing in nature that a person who is of unsound mind and declared so by a competent Court need to continue in the same state of mind forever. Based on the said contention it was submitted that in the case on hand after A-7 was arrested on 02. But subsequently, by communication dated 25. Goes without saying, the tenure of such an office of profit may differ from case to case. The respondent, thus, threw the blame on the appellant for the proposed project not being able to be finalized.
Under clause (b), a person who is of unsound mind and stands so declared by a competent Court is disqualified. 2008 while none of the other accused had any role to play either in Parbhani or in Jalna, nor was the so-called ‘Abhinav Bharat’ was involved in either Parbhani or Jalna occurrences. The next submission made on behalf of the appellants was that in order to constitute the earlier two offences to fall within the definition of ‘continuing unlawful activity’ for invoking the provisions of MCOCA after the third occurrence, the involvement of the accused must have been by the same advocate Chandigarh gang.
(i) a person must be of unsound mind and (ii) stands so declared by competent Court. The citizenship status of a person can change from time to time Each one of the events contemplated under the various clauses of Article 191(1) can subsist for a limited period of time depending upon the facts and circumstances of the case. Jurisdiction, powers and authority best law firm in Chandigarh service matters. The event which renders a person disqualified has two components in it. In the said decision in paragraph 15 is relevant which reads as under: The said contention raised on behalf of the revenue was rejected by holding as under in paragraph 93 The real issue which was considered by this Court on that aspect was based on the contention raised by the revenue that under Section 9(1)(i), it can look through the transfer of shares of a foreign company, holding shares in Indian company and treat the transfer of shares in the foreign company as equivalent to the transfer of shares to Indian companies on the premise that Section 9(1)(i) covers direct and indirect transfers of capital assets.
So is the case of status of undischarge insolvency and citizenship of India. 2011, the respondent tacitly informed the appellant that it decided to forthwith cancel the MoU dated 17. For example, under clause(a), the holding of office of profit specified therein renders a person disqualified. It was top law firms in Chandigarh contended that even as per the counter affidavit of the second respondent herein there was no nexus shown for the involvement of any of the accused in the Malegaon bomb blast case to do anything with Parbhani or Jalna bomb blast either individually or jointly as a member of gang or on behalf of the gang.
nIn the decision reported in Vodafone International Holdings (supra), three Judge Bench considered the question whether Section 9(1)(i) of the Income Tax Act can be said to be a provision enabling the Income Tax Department to apply the principle of look through. It is possible in some cases that with appropriate medical treatment, that unsoundness of mind could legal in Chandigarh be cured and on proof of the same, an appropriate declaration from the competent Court revoking the earlier declaration can always be obtained upon such declaration, the disqualification ceases.
2008 and top law firms in Chandigarh Jalna case a supplementary charge-sheet was filed on 15. 2007 in view of failure on the part of the appellant in complying with various terms and conditions of the MoU. In other words, even if it were to be held that a member of an ‘organized crime syndicate’ singly or jointly participated or on behalf of an ‘organized crime syndicate’ with reference to such participation taken place, what is to be ensured is that advocates in Chandigarh all the three cases the same gang, namely, the ‘organized crime syndicate’ must have been involved.
