1189 (2) [1953] INSC 46; [1954] SC. Thus, the learned Senior Counsel for the appellant argues that the term ‘case’ under Section 24(8) Cr. He shall, by virtue of his top lawyer in Chandigarh office, be the head of the University and the President of the Senate and shall, when present, preside at meetings of the Senate and law firms in Chandigarh at any convocation of the University nThe assessee, however, is entitled to claim the benefit of Section 11(1)(a). We also cannot agree with the Appellate Tribunal that this gratuity under the Award in this case is not a retrenchment benefit.
25F, and as the provisions of s. has been used in the restrictive sense by the Legislature to include only the trial and not the appeal. The appellant has already paid the compensation provided under s. Bhavani Singh by the Government of Tamil Nadu as a Special Public Prosecutor to represent the D. The State also has made a prayer that the ” ordinary ” fines imposed upon Satwant Singh may be enhanced. ” An election petition is an original proceeding instituted by the presentation of a petition under s.
In the circumstances we are of opinion that the Industrial Tribunal was right in holding that the scheme of the Award in this case providing for gratuity on retrenchment was exacty the same as compensation 51 provided under s. According to the appellant this is reinforced by the appointment of Mr. 25F only, and not both under that section and under the Award. As this question has come up to this Court for the first time, we order the parties to bear their own costs.
V the new Code has replaced the word ‘case’ with ‘appeal’. Section 11(1)(a) does not require investment of this limited accumulation in government securities In addition, under Section 11(1)(a), the assessee can accumulate 25% of its total income pertaining to the relevant assessment year and claim exemption in respect thereof. 303/2004 filed by TISCO against the judgment and order dated 23rd July, 2002 passed by the Jharkhand High Court.
We are of opinion that this is not correct. Contention: the term “case” is restricted only to trial and does not ipso facto extend to appeal: It has been contended by the learned Senior Counsel for the appellant that the term ‘case’ is restricted to only trial of the accused and with the disposal of the matter in the trial court, the authority of Special Public Prosecutor comes to an end and does not extend ipso facto to plead and appear before the appellate forum also.
2(00), we see no justification for compelling that payment twice over, once under s. -(1) The Governor of Tamil Nadu shall be the Chancellor of the University. Steel Authority of India Ltd. As will, therefore, be clear from the provisions of the Juvenile Justice Act, 2000, as amended by the Amendment Act, 2006 and the Juvenile Justice Rules, 2007, the scheme of the Act is to give children, who have, for some reason or the other, gone astray, to realise their mistakes, rehabilitate themselves and rebuild their lives and become useful citizens of society, instead of degenerating into hardened criminals [1] The grievance in this appeal is that though the application of the top Chandigarh law firm laid down by this court legal in Chandigarh State of Orissa v.
That being the character of the proceedings, the rule applicable is that which governs the trial of all original proceedings; that is, it is open to a party to put forward all grounds lawyer in Chandigarh support of or negation of the claim, subject only to such limitations as may be found in the Act. [2] (hereafter SAIL) has been accepted by the High Court, namely, that royalty is chargeable [in accordance with Section 9 of the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 (the MMDR Act)] on the quantity of coal extracted at the pit-head, yet the refund of excess royalty paid by TISCO for the period from 10th August, 1998 (the date of the decision in SAIL) till June 2002 [about Rs.
30 96 Satwant Singh has appealed against his conviction and sentence as ordered by the High Court. ” The learned Judge elaborated the point at a subsequent stage of the judgment thus: (3) Where any application for the exercise of the powers conferred by this section is dismissed, the Supreme Court may, if it is of opinion that the application was frivolous or vexatious, order the Chandigarh law firms applicant to pay by way of compensation to any person who has opposed the application such sum not exceeding one thousand rupees as it may consider appropriate in the circumstances of the case.
25F of the Act, and the workmen are only Chandigarh legal entitled to one or the other, whichever is more advantageous to them in view of s. In the set of appeals pertaining to TISCO, the first appeal is Civil Appeal No. 25F; the workmen therefore are not entitled to anything more under the Award. TISCO therefore claims entitlement to refund on the excess royalty paid by it for this period. (2), (3) and (4) xxx xxx xxx (5) Every Public Prosecutor, Additional Public Prosecutor and Special Public Prosecutor appointed by the State Government under sub-section (1), or as the case may be, sub-section (8), of Section 24 to conduct cases in the High Court shall be subordinate to the Director of Prosecution.
The matter would be different if the scheme in force in any concern or any award provides gratuity which is different best advocate in Chandigarh nature from the retrenchment compensation under s. Whether it is called “gratuity ” or ,compensation ” it is in substance a payment to the workman on account of retrenchment; and if a scheme like the present specifically provides payment for retrenchment as defined in s. The Appellate Tribunal seems to have been carried away by the word ” gratuity ” used in the Award and it seems to think that gratuity on retrenchment is something different from compensation on retrenchment.
25F and again under the scheme in force in the concern. This income, therefore, is entitled to an exemption under Section 11(1). We therefore allow the appeal, set aside the decision of the Appellate Tribunal and restore that of the Industrial Tribunal in this matter. In the present case, the assessee has applied Rs 8 lakhs for charitable purposes in India by purchasing a building which is to be utilised as a hospital. On the terms, therefore, of the Award in this case it must be held that gratuity provided therein on retrenchment is nothing more nor less than retrenchment compensation provided under s.
nA pragmatic condition, written or unwritten, proved by a prescription of profits or by long years, of invariable practice or spelt from some strong surrounding circumstances indicative of anti-profit motivation – such a condition will qualify for charitable purpose. All the parties have the right to adduce evidence and that is of the essence of an original proceeding as contrasted with a proceeding, by way of appeal. The State of Punjab has also appealed against the decision of the High Court that the “compulsory ” fines imposed were illegal.
25F are better than the provisions of the Award in respect of retrenchment the workmen would be entitled to compensation provided under s. We have already analysed the Award above and shown that it deals with three contingencies, and one of them is payment due on retrenchment.