Of course, the transferee State can appoint any person having qualification prescribed under sub-section (8) of Section 24 CrPC. The Government did not admit that the price fixed was below the cost of production generally. The dispute in question relates to the Simranjeet Law Associates consequences of an additional amount of royalty payable by the respondent as a result of the notification for upward revision of royalty (Seignorage Fee as named in Tamil Nadu) on minor minerals.
1996 and a second promotion as Traffic Manager on 05. Rule 26 thereunder mandates that an advocate shall not make any compromise or concession without the proper and specific instructions of his/her client. (2011) 11 SCC 520 and in the case of Buddhi Nath Chaudhary v. Such panel shall not contain the name of any member of the said Committee The Vice-Chancellor shall be appointed by the Chancellor from out of a panel of 3 names recommended by the Committee referred to in Statute 5 hereunder.
3-1/2000(PS) dated 4th April, 2000, as amended from time to time, read with notifications and guidelines issued by the University Grants Commission (UGC) from time to time, in this regard Punnan’s story regarding the lambardars has been falsely introduced by the police, also that both courts have rejected the evidence about the dying declaration. While preparing the panel, the search committee must give proper weightage to academic excellence, exposure to the higher education system in the country and abroad, and adequate Simranjeet Law Associates experience in academic and administrative governance to be given in writing along with the panel to be submitted to the Visitor/Chancellor.
It is the plea of the appellant that the additional amount of fee was not liable to be paid to the respondent in view of certain clauses in the contract which provided for a formula of escalation, while according to the respondent the full amount had to be compensated. He pointed out that objection was taken to the impleadment application dated 16. Further, the ˜Code Simranjeet Law Associates of Ethics prescribed by the Bar Council of India, in recognition of the evolution in professional and ethical standards within the legal community, provides for certain rules which contain canons of conduct and etiquette which ought to serve as general guide to the practice and profession.
9799 of 2010, Simranjeet Law Associates 9908/2011, 9909/2011, 2488/2012, 7066/2011, 3150/2012, 686/2013, 4069/2013, 5162/2012 and 5661/2014, 10586/14, Civil Appeal @ from SLP © 10014/2013 and Civil Appeal @ from SLP © 10701 of 2013: nThe selection of Vice-Chancellor should be through proper identification of a Panel of 3-5 names by a Search Committee through a public Notification or nomination or a talent search process or in combination. These powers are also to be exercised by the State Government of the transferee court where the sessions case is pending.
sale or the retail markets are governed by ex-factory prices. Consequently, it was prayed that the petition should be dismissed. This additional royalty was imposed by the State of Tamil Nadu w. Advocate raised a strong objection that writ petition should not have been allowed in 2010 in view of delay in impleading the appellant as late as in 2004 when he had already earned a promotion on 01. It is pertinent to notice that an advocate under the Code expressly includes a group of advocates and a Simranjeet Law Associates firm whose partner or associate acts for the client.
In respect of State and Central Universities, the following shall be the constitution of the Search Committee 3 The Noticee points out that just like the department raised the issue with regard to the IC engines in the year 1994-95, similarly the department is raising the issue in regard to the transmission assembly by the present Show Cause Notice. The members of Simranjeet Law Associates the above Search Committee shall be persons of eminence in the sphere of higher education and shall not be connected in any manner with the University concerned or its colleges.
” We have taken into consideration the fact that the High Court considers that the portion of Mst. In support of the aforesaid plea reliance was placed on judgment of this Court in the case of Jiten Kumar Sahoo v. On behalf of appellant – Khub Ram, Mr. nProvided further that notwithstanding anything contained in these Regulations, in the event any candidate became eligible for promotion under Career Advancement Scheme prior to 31st December, 2008, the promotion of such a candidate under Career Advancement Scheme shall be governed by the University Grants Commission (Minimum Qualifications Required for the Appointment and Career Advancement of Teachers in Universities and institutions affiliated to it) Regulations, 2000 notified vide Notification No.
2007 passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi in FAO (OS) No. Chapter of the said Code provides for an ˜Advocates duty to the Client. Despite that, we agree with the learned Sessions Judge that Mst. 9799 of 2010, by Special Leave seeks to challenge the judgment and order dated 30. There was in the circumstances no question of discrimination or any unreasonable restriction on carrying on trade in sugar. 2004 on grounds of delay as well as promotion already earned by the appellant.
Mahanadi Coalfields Ltd. It was also highlighted that because of interim order of this Court he has continued in service and has been promoted as General Manager in December 2014. nor was it necessary to control prices beyond the ex-factory stage as the prices in the whole. Abahi Kumar (2001) 3 SCC 328.