(91) In addition, best Chandigarh law firms where necessary in order to protect third parties who have acquired assets, rights and liabilities of the institution under resolution in good faith by virtue of the exercise of the resolution powers by the authorities and to ensure the stability of the financial markets, a right of appeal should not affect any subsequent administrative act or transaction concluded on the basis of an annulled decision.
No inference may therefore arise from the notifications best legal in Chandigarh issued by the State after enactment of Act 24 of 1955 in pursuance of the rules and Proclamation of 1910 that the Act was not intended to apply to kanam-tenants holding lands from Devaswoms. 2 & 3 thereof which set up a Common Trust and prescribed the management through the Devaswom Department. Again repeal best Chandigarh lawyers of the Proclamation would have necessitated re-enactment of cls. In the first place, it is not for an English court to decide what would amount to an appeal from an administrative act of the Portuguese Central Bank.
This is because a banking reconstruction under the EBRRD requires decisive steps to be taken, often as a matter of urgency, which the authorities in other member states can act on. 9 of the Cochin Proclamation amended the supplementary rules regulating the administration of lands belonging to Sirkar Devaswoms and thereby enabled tenants from whom paddy demand was due according to Pattah to deliver the 733 same in kind or pay the value of paddy calculated at the average nirak rate published by the Government.
Moreover, according to rule 42(1)(e) EPC, even the presence of an example is not mandatory. It appears more probable that the second defendant wanted someone to assist him in driving the taxi for part of the time and was training the third defendant to share the task of driving. Secondly, article 85(4) provides that an appeal is not to entail any automatic suspension of the challenged decision. The notifications are in general terms and could apply to tenures other than those governed by the statute enacted by the Legislature.
The machinery for grant of Pattah and the execution of kychit was prescribed under those rules. 1 However, article 83 EPC stipulates that an invention must be disclosed ‘in a manner sufficiently clear and complete for it to be carried out by a person skilled in the art’ (emphasis added by the board). Thus, the respondents’ argument does not convince the board. The notifications dated February 4, 1958, and July 1, 1958 issued by the Kerala Government top advocates in Chandigarh exercise of the powers conferred by cl.
The scheme of the Directives would be undermined if the acts of a designated national Resolution Authority were open to challenge lawyers in Chandigarh every other member state simply because they were open to challenge in the home state. The repeal of the Proclamation and the rules framed thereunder would have necessitated a fresh enactment under which the terms which were to govern the relations between the jenmi and the kanam-tenant were determined.
Article 3(1) of the Reorganisation Directive provides that the implementation of a reorganisation measure such as the August decision is a matter for the administrative or judicial authorities of the home state alone. In such cases, remedies for a wrongful decision should therefore be limited to the award of compensation for the damages suffered by the affected persons. No other conclusion would, as it seems to me, be consistent with the Directives. Once it is understood that the claim to interest is not truly based on unjust enrichment but on the failure to pay a debt on the due date, the conclusion inevitably follows that interest can be awarded on the claims within categories (b) and (c) under section 35A of the 1981 Act: see BP Exploration Co (Libya) Ltd v Hunt (No 2) [1979] 1 WLR 783, and Sempra Metals at paras 104 (Lord Nicholls) and 175 (Lord Walker).
Thus, article 83 EPC does not stipulate that a claimed invention must top legal in Chandigarh have actually been carried out by the applicant or the inventor. The Act must be deemed therefore to have partially superseded the Proclamation and the rules framed in so far as the latter related to the rights and obliga- tions of the kanam-tenants in respect of land held by them from the Devaswom Board. Applying the above tests to the facts of this case, we find that there is no proof that the second defendant was authorised to coach the cleaner so that the cleaner might become a driver and drive the taxi.
Consistently with that approach, article 85 of the EBRRD assigns appeals to the courts of the home state responsible for the reorganisation. Again the rules framed by the Diwan set up machinery for fixation of rent and other dues and for recovery thereof lawyer in Chandigarh respect of lands held on kanam and other tenures as well. Therefore, just because a patent discloses an effect which has not in reality been achieved, there is no reason – in the absence of convincing evidence that the effect cannot be achieved – for the board to doubt that the effect can be achieved.