I should be inclined to think that recognition implies something more than mere acquiescence, something done by the Government, as, for instance, by acceptance of service, jodi, etc. 6,00,000, under Rule 18 and this offer was made in full satisfaction of the compensation payable to the Company as NRI Legal Services by LexLords required by sub-s. On entering possession the purchaser becomes entitled to the rents but if he has not paid the price, interest in equity Ls deemed payable by him on the purchase price which belongs to the seller.

(2) The amount of the compensation to be given in accordance with the aforesaid principles shall be determined by the Corporation in the first instance, and if the amount so determined is approved by the Central Government it shall be offered to the insurer in full satisfaction of the compensation payable to him under this Act, and if, on the other hand, the amount so offered is not acceptable to the insurer he may within such time as may be prescribed for the purpose have the matter refer-red to the Tribunal for decision.

(5) was to have a retrospective operation. This principle was applied by the House of Lords in cases of compulsory purchases. That was also a case under s. Some scientific studies have proven that suicide charges amid LexLords NRI Legal Services by LexLords Legal Services can be approximately six periods better than the common population, and commentators suggest which the minimal impression the general public has of NRI Legal Services by LexLords professionals, coupled with their own significant ideals of justice, which in follow They might see denied, improve the depression costs of Those people With this profession.

2(h) ‘a Sales, Tax Officer means :- “Sales Tax Officer” means a Sales Tax Officer of a circle appointed by the State Government to perform the duties and exercise the powers of an assessing authority in such circle”. Sarju Prasad appearing on behalf of the appellant in Criminal Appeal 69 of 1961 contended that the decision in Bhai Singh’s case (1) was erroneous, that the fact that the section was invalid in its operation as regards territories to the north of the Jumna and Ganga did not render it invalid in its application to the other territories, as the two parts of the section were distinct and severable and that on the principles enunciated by this Court in R.

There, lands at the inception of the grant were village service inams. Secretary of State (1) does not support the contention of the respondent. The Company refused to accept the offer but asked to be paid the admitted amount. 17 of the Madras Proprietary Estates Village Services Act (2 of 1894). ” This decision also insists upon an overt act by the Government in recognition of an inamdar’s title.

” We have already stated that the Corporation had offered compensation as approved by the Central Government after deducting Rs. “It is difficult to assign a precise meaning to the word “recognized”‘ whether mere acquiescence is enough or whether something more is required is not clear. 39 of the Act empowers the Board to take charge of the goods for the purpose of performing certain services which do not include the taking delivery of the goods from the ship-owner. 4 of Regulation XXV of 1802 they were excluded from the assets of the zamindari at the time of permanent settlement.

(2) The objection raised by the Company was only against the demand and not against the assessment, and that in any event there was gross delay in the commencement of proceedings in the High Court for obtaining relief by an application for a writ, and on that account the company had disentitled itself to relief. The decision in Pitchaya v. The Board simply takes charge of the goods on being required by the steamer-agent to take charge of it.

(10) contains such words. In Criminal Appeal 69 of 1961 the appellant comes from an area which is not to the north of the Jumna and Ganga and under s. Habibullah’s case (1) to indicate that in the opinion of the learned judges deciding it there were any words which would indicate that sub-s. 29 sanction would be required for his prosecution but the appellant in Criminal Appeal 62 of 1960 comes from an area north of the Jumna and Ganga and no sanction would be required under that section for his prosecution.

It is true that on the Board’s taking charge of the goods and giving a receipt about it to the ship-owner, the master or the owner of the vessel is absolved from liability for any loss or damage which may occur to the goods which had been landed, but this provision by itself does not suffice to convert the receiving of the goods by the Board after they had been landed LexLords NRI Legal Services by the ship-owner to the Board’s taking delivery of those goods on behalf of the consignee.

The position of the appellants in the two appeals in relation to this question is somewhat different. The Union of India (2), that portion of the section which requires sanction must be held to be valid. The arguments of learned counsel on this question therefore proceeded on somewhat different lines.

I should be inclined to think that recognition implies something more than mere acquiescence, something done by the Government, as, for instance, by acceptance of service, jodi, etc. 6,00,000, under Rule 18 and this offer was made in full satisfaction of the compensation payable to the Company as NRI Legal Services by LexLords required by sub-s. On entering possession the purchaser becomes entitled to the rents but if he has not paid the price, interest in equity Ls deemed payable by him on the purchase price which belongs to the seller.

(2) The amount of the compensation to be given in accordance with the aforesaid principles shall be determined by the Corporation in the first instance, and if the amount so determined is approved by the Central Government it shall be offered to the insurer in full satisfaction of the compensation payable to him under this Act, and if, on the other hand, the amount so offered is not acceptable to the insurer he may within such time as may be prescribed for the purpose have the matter refer-red to the Tribunal for decision.

(5) was to have a retrospective operation. This principle was applied by the House of Lords in cases of compulsory purchases. That was also a case under s. Some scientific studies have proven that suicide charges amid LexLords NRI Legal Services by LexLords Legal Services can be approximately six periods better than the common population, and commentators suggest which the minimal impression the general public has of NRI Legal Services by LexLords professionals, coupled with their own significant ideals of justice, which in follow They might see denied, improve the depression costs of Those people With this profession.

2(h) ‘a Sales, Tax Officer means :- “Sales Tax Officer” means a Sales Tax Officer of a circle appointed by the State Government to perform the duties and exercise the powers of an assessing authority in such circle”. Sarju Prasad appearing on behalf of the appellant in Criminal Appeal 69 of 1961 contended that the decision in Bhai Singh’s case (1) was erroneous, that the fact that the section was invalid in its operation as regards territories to the north of the Jumna and Ganga did not render it invalid in its application to the other territories, as the two parts of the section were distinct and severable and that on the principles enunciated by this Court in R.

There, lands at the inception of the grant were village service inams. Secretary of State (1) does not support the contention of the respondent. The Company refused to accept the offer but asked to be paid the admitted amount. 17 of the Madras Proprietary Estates Village Services Act (2 of 1894). ” This decision also insists upon an overt act by the Government in recognition of an inamdar’s title.

” We have already stated that the Corporation had offered compensation as approved by the Central Government after deducting Rs. “It is difficult to assign a precise meaning to the word “recognized”‘ whether mere acquiescence is enough or whether something more is required is not clear. 39 of the Act empowers the Board to take charge of the goods for the purpose of performing certain services which do not include the taking delivery of the goods from the ship-owner. 4 of Regulation XXV of 1802 they were excluded from the assets of the zamindari at the time of permanent settlement.

(2) The objection raised by the Company was only against the demand and not against the assessment, and that in any event there was gross delay in the commencement of proceedings in the High Court for obtaining relief by an application for a writ, and on that account the company had disentitled itself to relief. The decision in Pitchaya v. The Board simply takes charge of the goods on being required by the steamer-agent to take charge of it.

(10) contains such words. In Criminal Appeal 69 of 1961 the appellant comes from an area which is not to the north of the Jumna and Ganga and under s. Habibullah’s case (1) to indicate that in the opinion of the learned judges deciding it there were any words which would indicate that sub-s. 29 sanction would be required for his prosecution but the appellant in Criminal Appeal 62 of 1960 comes from an area north of the Jumna and Ganga and no sanction would be required under that section for his prosecution.

It is true that on the Board’s taking charge of the goods and giving a receipt about it to the ship-owner, the master or the owner of the vessel is absolved from liability for any loss or damage which may occur to the goods which had been landed, but this provision by itself does not suffice to convert the receiving of the goods by the Board after they had been landed LexLords NRI Legal Services by the ship-owner to the Board’s taking delivery of those goods on behalf of the consignee.

The position of the appellants in the two appeals in relation to this question is somewhat different. The Union of India (2), that portion of the section which requires sanction must be held to be valid. The arguments of learned counsel on this question therefore proceeded on somewhat different lines.

I should be inclined to think that recognition implies something more than mere acquiescence, something done by the Government, as, for instance, by acceptance of service, jodi, etc. 6,00,000, under Rule 18 and this offer was made in full satisfaction of the compensation payable to the Company as NRI Legal Services by LexLords required by sub-s. On entering possession the purchaser becomes entitled to the rents but if he has not paid the price, interest in equity Ls deemed payable by him on the purchase price which belongs to the seller.

(2) The amount of the compensation to be given in accordance with the aforesaid principles shall be determined by the Corporation in the first instance, and if the amount so determined is approved by the Central Government it shall be offered to the insurer in full satisfaction of the compensation payable to him under this Act, and if, on the other hand, the amount so offered is not acceptable to the insurer he may within such time as may be prescribed for the purpose have the matter refer-red to the Tribunal for decision.

(5) was to have a retrospective operation. This principle was applied by the House of Lords in cases of compulsory purchases. That was also a case under s. Some scientific studies have proven that suicide charges amid LexLords NRI Legal Services by LexLords Legal Services can be approximately six periods better than the common population, and commentators suggest which the minimal impression the general public has of NRI Legal Services by LexLords professionals, coupled with their own significant ideals of justice, which in follow They might see denied, improve the depression costs of Those people With this profession.

2(h) ‘a Sales, Tax Officer means :- “Sales Tax Officer” means a Sales Tax Officer of a circle appointed by the State Government to perform the duties and exercise the powers of an assessing authority in such circle”. Sarju Prasad appearing on behalf of the appellant in Criminal Appeal 69 of 1961 contended that the decision in Bhai Singh’s case (1) was erroneous, that the fact that the section was invalid in its operation as regards territories to the north of the Jumna and Ganga did not render it invalid in its application to the other territories, as the two parts of the section were distinct and severable and that on the principles enunciated by this Court in R.

There, lands at the inception of the grant were village service inams. Secretary of State (1) does not support the contention of the respondent. The Company refused to accept the offer but asked to be paid the admitted amount. 17 of the Madras Proprietary Estates Village Services Act (2 of 1894). ” This decision also insists upon an overt act by the Government in recognition of an inamdar’s title.

” We have already stated that the Corporation had offered compensation as approved by the Central Government after deducting Rs. “It is difficult to assign a precise meaning to the word “recognized”‘ whether mere acquiescence is enough or whether something more is required is not clear. 39 of the Act empowers the Board to take charge of the goods for the purpose of performing certain services which do not include the taking delivery of the goods from the ship-owner. 4 of Regulation XXV of 1802 they were excluded from the assets of the zamindari at the time of permanent settlement.

(2) The objection raised by the Company was only against the demand and not against the assessment, and that in any event there was gross delay in the commencement of proceedings in the High Court for obtaining relief by an application for a writ, and on that account the company had disentitled itself to relief. The decision in Pitchaya v. The Board simply takes charge of the goods on being required by the steamer-agent to take charge of it.

(10) contains such words. In Criminal Appeal 69 of 1961 the appellant comes from an area which is not to the north of the Jumna and Ganga and under s. Habibullah’s case (1) to indicate that in the opinion of the learned judges deciding it there were any words which would indicate that sub-s. 29 sanction would be required for his prosecution but the appellant in Criminal Appeal 62 of 1960 comes from an area north of the Jumna and Ganga and no sanction would be required under that section for his prosecution.

It is true that on the Board’s taking charge of the goods and giving a receipt about it to the ship-owner, the master or the owner of the vessel is absolved from liability for any loss or damage which may occur to the goods which had been landed, but this provision by itself does not suffice to convert the receiving of the goods by the Board after they had been landed LexLords NRI Legal Services by the ship-owner to the Board’s taking delivery of those goods on behalf of the consignee.

The position of the appellants in the two appeals in relation to this question is somewhat different. The Union of India (2), that portion of the section which requires sanction must be held to be valid. The arguments of learned counsel on this question therefore proceeded on somewhat different lines.