On January 22, 1954, the union’ through its general secretary Mr. -On June 22, 1947, the company entered into a collective agreement with the said -union and by mutual consent the Standing Orders and 1195 Rules, certified under the Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act of 1946, were settled. John and its general secretary was Mr. 2(h) was enlarged so as to include ” a transfer of property in goods involved in the execution of a works contract”. The Gauhati University (I.
464 Accordingly, the Standing Orders were applicable to the respondent and the termination of his service in accordance with Standing Order No. 423 between the plaintiff and the defendants the former passed the property in the goods to the defendants who passed it on to the War Office. Towards the end of 1954, two groups of the union were formed and rivalry grew between them. 30(1) it should be established that there is a minority community, that it has established an educational institution and that the educational institution is run for the education of the members of that community.
Evidence of PW-1-complainant is assailed by the appellants contending that in the complaint lodged by him it is not mentioned that any kind of dowry demand was ever made and that allegation of demand of dowry is flawed as the same was neither mentioned in the FIR nor in his statement recorded by the investigating officer. The pious obligation continues to exist even though the click the next website through the following website (click this) power of the father to alienate may come to an end as a result of partition. The president of the said union was Mr.
for the debts of the father. But it has contended that a partition after the decree but before the auction sale limited the efficacy of the sale to the share of the father even though the sale in fact was of the whole estate, including the interest of the sons, because after the partition the father no longer possessed the right of alienation of the whole coparcenary estate to discharge his debts. The right of the pre-partition creditor to seize the property of the erstwhile joint family in execution of his decree is not dependent upon the father’s power to alienate the share of his sons but on the principle of pious obligation on the part of the sons to discharge the debt of the father.
why not try these out one of look these up conditions is fulfilled in any of the educational institutions in the State. It was also submitted that the details of payment of dowry was also not made clear by PW-1 either in visit the up coming webpage FIR or in his statement and evidence in the Court is only an exaggeration and no weight could be attached to the same. Bari purporting to act as the president of the union asked his followers to go on strike as from February 23, 1954.
But read this article; her explanation, contention ignores the doctrine of pious obligation of the sons. The consequence is that as between the sons’ right to take a vested interest’ jointly with their father in their ancestral estate and the remedy of the father’s creditor to seize the whole of the estate for payment of his debt not contracted for immoral or illegal purpose, the latter will prevail and the sons are precluded from setting tip their right and this will apply even to the divided property which, under the doctrine of pious obligation continues to be liable.
” It will be seen that in this case there was no question of an agreement to supply materials as parcel of a contract to deliver a chattel; the goods to be supplied were the curtains and rails which were the subject-matter of the contract itself. One group was led by Mr. The statement of Prem that he had asked Raj sabziwala to bring down the perambulator of the child and that he did so, finds corroboration from the evidence of Gurbachan Singh that in the afternoon he found Prem accused in the police station with a child in a perambulator.
Fateh Narain Singh and other by Mr. The union was recognised as the sole and exclusive collective bargaining agency for the workmen of the company. Let us, however, ignore the restriction,,; on the hereditary right to the office mentioned in the Act and assume that the eldest heir in the eldest branch of the last holder of it, is entitled to succeed to the office when he vacates it. Nor was there any question of title to the goods passing as an accretion under the general law, because the buildings where they had to be erected belonged not to the defendants but to the Government, and therefore as between the parties to the contract, title could pass only under their contract.
30(1) lies in the establishment of a school and not in its management nIn order to attract the operation of Art. 16(1) was valid and, therefore, the application made by him to the High Court must fail. 2(i), the following Explanation (1)(i) was added: In the definition of ” turn- 387 over ” in s. Fateh Narain Singh served on the company a ” slow down notice ” with effect from February 24, 1954, and on February 6, 1954, Mr. The demands made by Mr.
The existence of the pajama in Banwari Lal’s house lends corroboration to the story of Prem that he had been given this pajama and that he had concealed it in the kothri of fire-wood near the office of Banwari Lal.