He however floated a Main Page (please click the next document) suggestion that even when no period of limitation is applicable for initiating action before the Commission, if this Court finds it necessary and in the interest of justice, then a reasonable period may be indicated by this Court for the aforesaid purpose. Steel Corporation (supra). At the same time, the refund had not been actually paid to the assessee till 1991 when the provisions of Section 11B came to be amended. 60 of the Transfer of-Property Act empowers the Court not only to relieve a mortgagor of a bargain whereby in certain circumstances his right to redeem the mortgage is wholly taken away, but also where that right is restricted.
30, Limbaji Manohar Rathod Accused No. ), Gulbarga, Reference Court in LAC No. , the notice of recrimination given by the appellant under s. 32157 of 2012 (LAC) by the High Court of Karnataka, Circuit Bench at Gulbarga (filed against the judgment and order dated 29. ” The Tribunal held that by virtue of the provisions of s. All the stages as stated above and the acts at each stage are corroborated by other material on record. 97 and the objection filed by the first respondent to the same came up for hearing before the Election Tribunal, Dharwar, and the Tribunal framed the following issues:- ” (1) Whether the 1st respondent is entitled to abandon a part of his claim in the simply click the up coming webpage (please click the next document) manner he has done ?
The witness identified all the three accused namely Ramchandra, Kisan and Sitaram. Except referring to the initial blow which was given to Bhanudas, her testimony concentrates only upon those who were primarily responsible for having pursued and assaulted her husband. Nagappan) New Delhi August 11, 2015 ———————– [1] A. (1) On making an award under Section 11, the Collector shall tender payment of the compensation awarded by him to the persons interested entitled thereto according to the award, and shall pay it to them unless prevented by some one or more of the contingencies mentioned in the next sub-section Further, in the said case, after adverting to Section 34 of the Act, browse around this web-site Court held thus:- 24.
That apart, it has to be remembered that justice in its conceptual eventuality and connotative expanse engulfs the magnanimity of the sun, the sternness of mountain, the complexity of creation, the simplicity and humility of a saint and the austerity of a Spartan, but it always remains wedded to rule of law absolutely unshaken, unterrified, unperturbed and loyal. 2, Jaysingh Devappa Rathod Accused No. When my husband entered the house of Hemla, Ramlal Devappa Rathod Accused No.
(c) In a case where no appeal or reference or writ petition is admitted and pending before any appellate authority or High Court or the Supreme Court or no application for revision is pending before the Central Government on the date of declaration made under Section 88. The rule against clogs on the equity of redemption embodied in s. However, the designated authority passed the order dated February 13, 1999 thereon whereby he rejected the declaration on the ground that in the appellants’ case, no show-cause notice/demand notice had been issued and, therefore, by virtue of Section 95(ii)(b), the Scheme did not apply.
19819 of 2013 is arising check out this site of the impugned judgment and order dated 05. The deposition of PW12 Sarojini shows that while Tanaji was being pursued and assaulted, her attention was focussed in so far as her husband was concerned, which is quite natural. (3) Whether the notice of recrimination given by the appellant is barred by limitation ? The application of the first respondent under 0. 29, Pandit Gopa Rathod Accused No. This obviously happened before the amendment in the Section in the year 1991.
1, Shivaji Ramaji Wadaje Accused No. 2012 of Principal Civil Judge (Sr. Challenge in the appeal arising out of SLP No. The minimum number of Judges who are to sit for the purpose of deciding any case involving a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of this Constitution or for the purpose of hearing any reference under Article 143 shall be five: Bhattacharjee , Equality, Liberty & Property under click the up coming web page – click the next page – Constitution of India, (Eastern Law House, New Delhi, 1997) [2] Article 145(3).
943 of 1997) whereby, the High Court upheld the quantum of compensation awarded by the Principal Civil Judge (Sr. 1, of the Code of Civil Procedure. They caught visit my web page husband by his hands and feet and took him in the field of Hemla Rathod which is in front of his house. (2) If so, whether the appellant will be entitled to give notice to the Tribunal of his intention to give evidence to prove that the election of the first respondent would have been void if he had been the returned candidate ?
He hastened to add that such reasonable period can only be as an illustration and not as a fixed period. Presently, they are undergoing sentence imposed by the High Court and therefore, we direct the Jail Superintendent, Rajkot Central Prison, Rajkot, Gujarat to release them forthwith, if not required in connection with any other criminal case. ) and declined to interfere with the same and dismissed the appeal filed by the appellants. 3, Ramchandra Lalu Nadaje Accused No.
The appellants opted to avail of the Scheme and filed a declaration accordingly. The proviso to Section 34 of the Act makes the position further clear. 12, went inside the house of Hemla.