(vi) It is a settled legal position that the court which grants the bail also has the power to cancel it. The charges, therefore, were not for land usage or area allotted simpliciter. mouse click the next internet page date of communication of the order to the party whose rights visit site (click the up coming web page) are affected is not the relevant date for purposes of determining whether the power has been exercised within the prescribed time. The discretion of grant or cancellation of bail can be exercised either at the instance of the accused, the Public Prosecutor or the complainant, on finding new material or circumstances at over here (click the up coming web page) Suggested Site [click the up coming web page] any point of time.
But if it is a limitation for a competent authority to make an order the date of exercise of that power and in the case of exercise of suo motu power over at this website (their website) the subordinate authorities orders, the date on which such power was exercised by making an order are the relevant dates for determining the limitation. The substance of these charges was ingrained in the various facilities offered to meet the requirement of passengers’ safety and on safe landing and parking of the aircraft and these were the consideration that, in reality, governed the fixation of the charges.
It was made by the deceased within about two hours from the incident and a few hours before his death. He conceded that the finding recorded by the income-tax authorities 49. from the date of publication in the official gazette. Eventually, the Court came to hold thus: The ratio of this distinction may also be founded on the principle that the Government is bound by the proceedings of its officers but persons affected are not concluded by the decision. When a claim for payment of interest is made by a person whose immovable property has been acquired compulsorily he is not making claim for damages properly or technically so called; he is basing his claim on the general rule that if he is deprived of his land he should be put in possession of compensation immediately; if not, in lieu of possession taken by compulsory acquisition interest should be paid to him on the said amount of compensation.
The first thing to notice about Rule 20 is, as its marginal note states, that it is concerned only with the date of commencement of duty. check this site out brings us to Rule 20, the correct construction of which is determinative of the question raised in these appeals. Thus if the intention or design of the statutory provision was to protect the interest of the person adversely affected, by providing a remedy against the order or decision any period of limitation prescribed with reference to invoking such remedy shall be read as commencing from the date of communication of the order.
The order or decision of such authority comes into force or becomes operative or becomes an effective order or decision on and from the date when it is signed by him. Therefore, in order to see as to when the list was prepared and made available for sale or inspection, it is necessary to read this post here Section 28 (k) of the Act. In sub-rule (1), it speaks of anti-dumping duties levied under Rule 13 and Rule 19, and states that they shall take effect only prospectively, i.
The date of such order or decision is the date on which the order or decision was passed or made: that is to say when he ceases to have any authority to tear it off and draft a different order and when he ceases to have any locus paetentiae. Once this is appreciated, it becomes clear that its focus is only on when anti-dumping duties are to commence. The conviction of the appellant is based solely upon the dying declaration. It has been found to be reliable. To our mind, the aforesaid conclusion of the High Court of Madras is justified which is based on sound rationale and reasoning.
After taken into consideration these aspects, the Madras High Court came click here to read just click the following webpage conclusion that the facility was not of ‘use of land’ per se but the charges on landing and take-off by the AAI from these airlines were in respect of number of facilities provided by the AAI which was to be necessarily provided in compliance with the various international protocol. In other words, the starting point of limitation for filing the election petition for counting 10 days is the date” on which the list prescribed under clause (k) of Section 28 of the Act was available for sale or inspection.
These were the charges for various services provided. Viswanatha Sastri, for the appellant, did not challenge before us the correctness of the view taken by the High Court on the second question in respect of the expenditure of Rs. Instead of taking a myopic view taken by the Delhi High Court by only considering use of the land per se, the Madras High Court examined the matter keeping wider perspective in mind thereby encompassing the utilization of the airport providing the facility of landing and take-off of the airplanes and also parking facility.
Normally that happens when the order or decision is made public or notified in some form or when it can be said to have left his hand. on which the list prescribed under clause (k) of Section 28 of the Act was available for sale or inspection.