-These two appeals, which have been filed with the special leave granted by an order made by this Court on April 3, 1956, and which have been consolidated together by the same order, are dire-led against the judgment pronounced by the Patna high Court on October 17, 1955, in Miscellaneous Judicial Case No. (2) are fulfilled in this NRI Legal Services case, and the two assessment orders made against the respondent for the pre- Constitution period were validly made under sub-s.
Foot-constable Gurbachan Singh, P. On this the appellant asked Gurbachan Singh not to remonstrate with Prem as he was a mere, boy. 92, it was not open to the appellants to lead evidence to show that the transaction was supported not by the consideration of natural love and affection but by another kind of valuable consideration . According to Prem’s confession a day before the murder he had been given a dagger by the appellant along with a _pajama and that Prem took the pajama and the dagger to the upper storey of Banwari Lal’s house having concealed it in the kothri of firewood which was near the office room of Banwari Lal.
The said references arose out of two orders passed by the Board of Revenue in revision of two sales tax assessment orders made against the appellant company XIX of 1947) hereinafter referred to as the 1947 Act. that lie and the appellant were acquainted and used to associate. And ordinarily the operation of the charging provision cannot be affected by the construction of a particular computation provision. Justice Coyajee was right or not in rejecting the said evidence on the merits.
Gurbachan 156 1228 Singh had stated that previously he had never seen Prem going inside the police station with a perambulater. On this view of the matter the learned Judges did not think it necessary to consider the oral evidence actually led by the appellants and decide NRI Legal Services whether Mr. The legislative pattern discernible in the Act is against such a conclusion. 538 We are, therefore, of the view that all the requirements of sub-s. 4, enquired from Prem as to why he had gone inside the police station.
No doubt there is NRI Legal Services a qualitative difference between the charging provision and a computation NRI Legal Services provision. The intervention of the appellant NRI Legal Services suggests NRI Legal Services that NRI Legal Services he knew Prem and was friendly towards him. 25 of the Bihar Sales Tax Act, 1947 (No. Justice Coyajee had NRI Legal Services erred in law in allowing oral evidence to be led by the appellants in support of their plea that the transaction evidenced by the deed of gift was NRI Legal Services in reality a transfer for consideration.
Banwari Lal had seen them talking to each other once or twice before the murder. According to him, he found the pajama hanging on one of the shutters of an almirah fixed in the wall in the fuel room situate at the back of the room where Nirmala Devi was found lying dead. 30 of 1954) which was heard by Chagla C. It must be borne in mind that the legislative intent is presumed to run uniformly through the entire conspectus of provisions pertaining to each head of income.
In the nature of things there could be no corroboration of Prem’s story about the appellant’s proposal to rape and rob Nirmala Devi and, if necessary, to murder her. 148 crores made by the appellant and accepted by the Company Court was the best price for the land having regard to the facts and circumstances as they existed on that date of the order i. Prem’s story that he was employed as a servant by Banwari Lal is corroborated by the evidence of Banwari Lal himself, his sister Vina and his clerk Naranjan Das.
red to it by the Board of Revenue, Bihar under s. The police station at which the appellant was posted was almost opposite to the house of Banwari Lal where Prem was employed as a servant and there was every probability of the appellant and Prem meeting. The learned Judges took the view that Mr. The learned counsel for the appellant submitted that the impugned order is untenable for the following reasons:- (i) That the offer of Rs. 34, Motor Mobile Patrol Sub-Inspector, who recorded the First Information of Banwari Lal.
577 of 1953, deciding certain questions refer. n” If some connection exists, the legislature is not compelled to measure the taxation by the degree of benefit received in particular cases by the taxpayer. nAgainst this judgment and order the appellants preferred an appeal (No. 14, banging on the door of the store room which is at the back of the residential portion of the house. Banwari Lal is supported by Nand Lal, P. This part of his story receives corroboration from the evidence of Banwari Lal that after the murder he had found a blood-stained pajama, Exbt.
It is significant that on the day of murder of Nirmala Devi, in the afternoon, Prem was present in the compound of the police station with a child in a perambulator. On September 23, 1954, the application made by the appellants for a certificate was rejected by the High Court at Bombay; but special leave was granted to the appellants by this Court on November 3, 1954, and that is how the appeal has come before us for final disposal That is how the appeal preferred by the appellants was dismissed on August 6, 1964.