Rasheed are the children of Jambusab from his second wife Azizabi. (2) (a) Every owner and NRI Legal Services every occupier as aforesaid shall be bound to comply with such notice and to furnish a return with a declaration that the statement made therein is correct to the best of knowledge and belief of such owner and occupier. The first wifes son was Abdul Sakoorsab, who died in the year 1967. Abdul Rahiman Sab alias Jambusab.
It is indeed Generally correct to say that where an administrative body or authority is under a duty to act judicially, its function is judicial or NRI Legal Services quasi-judicial. The children of late Jambusab could not agree to divide the properties of late NRI Legal Services Jambusab. observed in the latter case at p. The first plaintiff and his younger brother NRI Legal Services R. After that, he threatened her of dire consequences saying that he had taken her photographs. The difficulty arises in cases where the point taken is that by necessary implication the statute requires an administrative body or executive authority to act judicially.
The plaintiff-respondent claimed to be the son of Late P. n26, 29 and 30 were considered by this Court in The Commissioner, Hindu Religious Endowments, Madras v. 1005 at 1028-1029) and The State of Bombay v. Sri Lakshmindra Thirtha Swamiar of Sri Shirur Mulutt, ( [1954] INSC 46; [1954] S. It is said that where there is ‘ a duty to act judicially ‘, the function is quasijudicial: that however does not help us very much in understanding the distinction between an administrative function and a quasi- judicial function.
Onbehalf of the appellants, it was urged that the implementation of the impugned judgment of the Division Bench of the High Court would result in conferring seniority to a less qualified and less experienced Assistant Divisional Engineer appointed from Junior Engineer belonging to SC/ST category and who stand on a higher footing both on education and experience than the Assistant Divisional Engineers belonging to general category would offend the rule of equality.
They litigated and ultimately in R. The law of bails dovetails two conflicting interests, namely, on the one hand, the requirements of shielding society from the hazards of those committing crimes and potentiality of repeating the same crime while on bail and on the other hand, absolute adherence to the fundamental principle of criminal jurisprudence regarding presumption of innocence of an accused until he is found guilty and the sanctity of individual liberty.
Abdul Majeed, Maqubal Jan and Aktharunnisa. Through the 3rd wife Mahajambi, Jamusab had begotten 4 children namely, A. Bombay Education Society, ( [1954] INSC 76; [1955] 1 S. 53-A of the Act is in its true nature an administrative act. It has received the NRI Legal Services approval of this Court in Panna Lal v. At that stage, she told her husband and in-laws. This complaint further states that she shifted to Ahmedabad but even after NRI Legal Services coming to Ahmedabad, he started sending letters with the threat to defame her.
The principles which can be culled out, for the purposes of the instant case, can be stated as under: This appeal involves issues of great public importance pertaining to the importance of individual’s personal liberty and the society’s interest. This way he continued to keep relations with the prosecutrix. ” Whoever abets any offence punishable under section 161 or section 165, whether or not that 1281 offence is committed in consequence of the abetment, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three years, or with fine or with both “.
Naraini (1) and Sidheshwar Mukherji v. The late Jambusab had three wives. It was further submitted that post of Assistant Engineers to be promoted as ADEs constitute more than 75% of the cadre strength and by not applying the ˜catch up rule among the Assistant Divisional Engineers promoted from Junior Engineers by following rule of reservation would result in patent discrimination creating disharmony amongst the cadre. But it is, to some extent, a tautology to say that the function is judicial or quasi- judicial if it is to be done judicially.
Society has a vital interest in grant or refusal of bail because every criminal offence is the offence against the State. The order granting or refusing bail must reflect perfect balance between the conflicting interests, namely, sanctity of individual liberty and the interest of the society. 1394 to the Hindu son’s liability to pay the debts of his father after partition, and by the mere device of entering into partition with their father, the sons cannot get rid of this pious obligation.
Bubneshwar Prasad Narain Singh (2) where Mukherjea J. I am of the view that the action taken by the State Government under s. Where the statute clearly indicates that the function is judicial, there is little difficulty. Rajiv Dhawan, learned Senior Counsel for the appellants submitted that while it is well-settled law followed by this Court in a 212 that Article 16 (4A) is only an enabling provision and does not automatically confer right on the reserved categories and when no policy decision was taken by the State, Article 16 (4A) does not per se applicable to Tamil Nadu Highways Engineering Service conferring consequential seniority to the Junior Engineers who obtained accelerated promotion NRI Legal Services by following rule of reservation.