Seasoned Law Firms in Chandigarh High Court for Writ

Reliance placed upon such a preliminary enquiry without complying with the minimal requirements of the principle of natural justice is against all canons of fair play and justice. ” The Judicial Committee in Hirji Mulji v. On the same date the Magistrate ordered commitment of the four appellants to the Court of Session on these charges. ” lawyer Such conduct on the part of Jadunath is legal service incredible and any Judge of facts with experience of normal human conduct could have no hesitation in coming to the conclusion that things could not have happened in the way Jadunath has described.

This test is special to the cases of weak or tainted evidence like that of the approver. If this test is satisfied the second test which still remains to be applied is that the approver’s evidence must receive sufficient corroboration. This Court went on to observe, ” The argument that the character of the approver’s evidence has not been considered by the High Court cannot be characterised as merely academic or theoretical in the present case because, as we shall presently point out, the evidence of the approver is so thoroughly discrepant that it would be difficult to resist the conclusion that the approver best lawyer in Chandigarh the present case is a wholly unreliable witness.

, the supervening disqualifications acquired subsequent to the election of a person to the Legislature Dealing with the scope of Article 192, this Court concluded that the authority of the Governor to examine the question of disqualification extended only to the 2nd of the above-mentioned two categories of disqualification i. It is further evident that the appellate authority also misdirected himself in passing the said order insofar as he failed to take into consideration the relevant facts and based his decision on irrelevant factors.

and the only question which was asked was: Where he had obtained the information about the sale and nothing was asked about what properties had been sold or for how much had they been sold. The remaining three accused were discharged. In cross-examination Jadunath made the further statement in these words:- ” When I broke the news Radha Prasad did not ask me where I had received the information, or who had purchased the properties; what properties had been purchased or what the consideration was.

It is true that in Sarwan Singh’s case this Court had held, ” The appreciation of an approver’s evidence has to satisfy a double test. Cheong Yue Steamship Company (1) gives another test at p. Extracts of the Punjab Jail Manual are also available on record of the case, only a few relevant paragraphs, which highlight the duties and responsibilities vested on the shoulders of Ved Mitter Gill as Deputy Superintendent of Police, Jail, are being extracted hereunder: (emphasis is ours) A perusal of the duty chart relating to Ved Mitter Gill reveals, that he was responsible for duties expressed in paragraphs 92 to 132 of the Punjab Jail Manual.

35, the question which immediately arises on the facts of the present case is whether the whole of the subject-matter of the reference in this case was covered by the top Chandigarh legal services pro- ceedings taken by the appellant by its application under s. It must show that he is a reliable witness and that his evidence receives sufficient corroboration and that is a test which is common to all witnesses. However, if a preliminary enquiry could be conducted, we fail to see any reason as to why a formal departmental enquiry could not have been initiated against the appellant.

(v) In the case in hand, since the authorities have invoked the extraordinary power under Rule 14(ii) dispensing with the inquiry, and further since the alleged incident was held to be not proved by the criminal court, after thorough trial, the appellate and revisional authorities ought to have considered the said aspect of acquittal while imposing the punishment. ” These observations were made in the special circumstances of the case which this Court was deciding when dealing with the case of Sarwan Singh.

The appellate authority, as notice hereinbefore, in its order dated 24-6-1998 jumped to the Chandigarh lawyer conclusion that he was guilty of lawyers in Chandigarh grave acts of misconduct proving complete unfitness for police service and the punishment awarded to him is commensurate with the misconduct although no material therefor was available on record. Therefore, we are of the view that the fact of acquittal is a circumstance to be considered while awarding punishment in this case.

On that date the Magistrate framed charges against the four appellants under ss. ” The test law firms in Chandigarh such cases has been said to be whether the contract is determined by something outside itself, top lawyers in Chandigarh which case the arbitration clause 509 is determined with it, or by something arising out of the contract, lawyer in Chandigarh which case the arbitration clause. Aggrieved by the said judgment and order of the Division Bench of the High Court, the present appeal is filed by the appellant with a prayer to set aside the judgments and orders of the JCC and the High Court by quashing the same and requested to pass such orders as this Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case by urging various facts and best legal services in Chandigarh contentions.

471 and 477A of the Penal Code. remains effective and can be enforced. Likelihood of anomalous situation If the High Court entertains a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India against order passed by Armed Forces Tribunal under Section 14 or Section 15 of the Act bypassing the machinery of statute i. 409 and 465 read with s.