15 best legal services in Chandigarh is the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Sambalpur. ” 42 330 The managing director of a private company, empowered by the terms of the agreement between him and the company and the articles thereof to appoint, by deed or by will, any person to be the managing director in his place and stead, died leaving a will whereby he appointed one of the appellants the managing director in his place from the date of his death. The defence examined one witness D. The test may well be whether the public servant, if challenged, can reasonably claim that, what he does, he does in virtue of his office.
The Additional Sessions Judge held that the three male persons were guilty. 403 of the Criminal Precedure Code or the “subsequent change in the law introduced by the Supreme Court decision ” in Kedar Nath Bajoria v. It is pertinent to mention that the learned counsel appearing for the TTD had given his no objection to the rate fixed by the Reference Court which was duly recorded by the Court in Para 8 of the award dated 14. 6, 8, 9, 11, 12 are local persons, P. 1 is the wife of the injured P.
312 of the Companies Act, 1956, “Any assignment of his office made after the commencement of this Act by any direc- tor of a company shall be void. 1,7,6,9,11 and 12 on the aspect of presence of P. 1 at the best Chandigarh legal services spot, and threats given by the accused Sanatan or other male accused persons to P. It is best Chandigarh law firms a basic law that in a criminal case, in which the accused is alleged to have inflicted physical injury to another person, the burden is on the prosecution to prove that the accused was present at the scene and has participated in the crime.
lawyer best Chandigarh advocate The State of West Bengal(1). In the instant case, considering the nature of injuries and the previous animosity, we are of the considered opinion that it is not a fit case where the offence under Section 302 IPC should be converted to Section 304 Part I IPC. 2012 in ‘Bangalore Mirror’ and on 05. 13 are police constables, P. 1) has excluded Chandigarh legal the presence of best advocate in Chandigarh accused Sanatan at the place of occurrence as both of them went home from Fuljijaran and accused Sanatan was with him from 7 P.
Camber [1855] EngR 116; (15 C. 2011 in ‘Vijaya Karnataka’ a Kannada daily, which was repeated on 3. Gill’s case(3) and Neogy’s case (2) dealt with an offence of bribery under s. ” The same test was repeated in Meads’ case (1) and in Phenindra Chandra Neogy v. 2012 in The Times of India, English edition. 1, not supported by independent corroboration. 572); and if money be so paid by a plaintiff at the request of a defendant, it can be recovered by action against him : Knight v.
The female accused had been falsely implicated in this case on exaggerated version of P. if his act is such as to lie within the scope of Is official duty. It is because one of the relevant factors to gather the intention is the nature of injury inflicted on the deceased. nOn the other hand, Mr. In the Court of Additional Sessions Judge, to bring charges home to the accused persons, the prosecution examined 15 witnesses of whom, P.
If anything is done by a party in violation of the law, consequence has to follow and they are bound to return the money to the parties from whom excess amount has been realised In the present case, it is a case of refund of price recovered by the appellant in excess and not of any kind of payment of tax or duty. The defence witness (D. The Sessions Court, on analysis of the evidence adduced by the parties, decided that there were little contradictions and discrepancies in the evidence of P.
Besides, the appellant has already refunded such excess amount realised to many other parties without raising any such plea. 115 “A public servant can only be said to act or to purport to act in the discharge of his official duty. The result was that the appellant’s prayer for quashing the pro- ceedings was rejected and the appellant has come in appeal by special leave against this decision of the High Court. The High Court took the view that the word ‘assignment’ in the section included ‘appointment’ and as such the appointment in question was void.
However, the evidence of P. The Latin word alibi means elsewhere and that word is used for convenience when an accused takes recourse to a defence line that when the occurrence took place he was so far away from the place of occurrence that it is extremely improbable that he would have participated in the crime. 12 preparing Biri on the verandah of Kulamani Budhia has not been challenged by the prosecution to the extent of her finding the accused Upendra absent from the spot.
7 and mother of the deceased, P. The complaint against the appellant has not been lodged either before the Lokayukta or Upa lokayukta but the same was registered suo-moto at the Police Station attached to the Lokayukta and therefore, the procedure provided under the provisions of the Lokayukta Act was not required to be followed as contended by the learned senior counsel on behalf of the appellant Patil, the learned senior counsel on behalf of the respondents has rebutted the aforesaid legal contentions urged on behalf of the appellant, stating that the Inspector of Police of the Lokayukta has taken note of the news item published in the Newspaper on 28.