Defibrillators for internal use and pacemakers. The matter was carried in appeal by the appellant by filing FAO (OS) No. There is no doubt that in dealing with issue No. 5 of the Employees’ Provident Fund Act, 1952 (Act 19 of 1952). The version of RW 5 Mr. 8/96 and 4/97 with which we are directly concerned. In fact the learned Attorney-General suggested that in deciding issue No. There shall be a lease in Form I in respect of each such intermediary, and the same shall be registered and numbered in the office of the Collector.
This additional royalty was imposed by the State of Tamil Nadu w. They must bear in mind that what may be appropriate and lawful for a person who is not a member of the Bar, or for a member of the Bar in his non- professional capacity, may be improper for an advocate in his professional capacity. The Preamble makes it imperative that an advocate has to conduct himself and his duties in an extremely responsible manner. He denied the suggestion that Mr.
302 of 2012 before the Division Bench which was dismissed vide judgment and order dated 13. In regard to the workmen already in the employment of the appellant it has been brought to our notice by the appellant that the workmen themselves wanted that the age of superannuation should be fixed; and it is also urged that fixing the age of superannuation at 60 as suggested by the respondent would be inconsistent with paragraph 69 of the Employees’ Provident Fund Scheme, 1952, notified under s.
That is the substance of his contention. Dealing with the concept of chance witness, a two-Judge Bench in Rana Pratap and others v. Ram Chander Saini deposed on oath that he used to represent Mr. 1 the tribunal has merely to say yes or no. It is the plea of the appellant that the additional amount of fee was not liable to be paid to the respondent in view of certain clauses in the contract which provided for a formula of escalation, while according to the respondent the full amount had to be compensated.
Patient Cable for Pacemaker. The next contention of the learned senior counsel for the appellants is that the prosecution witnesses are chance witnesses, for there is no occasion on their part to be at the scene of crime. 11/- per square feet as the uniform rate for awarding compensation for the land to all the landowners. Bhupesh Gupta is also of not any consequence vis-à-vis the issues involved. These are as follows:- II. Therefore, the conferment legal services in Chandigarh of such a power on the State Government and not upon a subordinate officer is only one of the considerations that may enter into the judicial verdict on the reasonableness of a particular Chandigarh law firm and the reasonableness of that law firms falls to be decided only on the cumulative effect of the circumstances under which such power is conferred.
We now reproduce the relevant portion of the two Notification Nos. 1 the tribunal had to consider not only the propriety, reasonableness and fairness of the rule, but it had also to deal with the question as to whether the said rule could and should Lawyers Chandigarh be made applicable to employees who had already been employed by the appellant in service without any limitation as to the age of retirement. This award was challenged by the appellant by filing OMP No. The LAO, therefore, fixed Rs.
Nathu Singh in various legal proceedings including one instituted against the appellant. It is a basic top Chandigarh law firm that in a criminal case, in which the accused is alleged to have inflicted physical injury to another person, the burden is on the prosecution to prove that the accused was present at the scene and has participated in the crime. The Latin word alibi means elsewhere and that word is used for convenience when an accused takes recourse to a defence line that when the occurrence took place he was so far away from the place of occurrence that it is extremely improbable that he would have participated in the crime.
We are satisfied that this contention is misconceived. SCHEDULE F [Rule 4] Land comprised in a tea garden retained by an intermediary under sub- section (1), read with sub-section (3), of section 6 shall be deemed to be held directly under the State from the date of vesting as a tenant [until a lease is granted in Form I appended to this schedule, on such terms and conditions as may be specified by the Collector in a summary settlement, and thereafter, on a lease being granted in Form I appended to this schedule, on the terms and conditions specified in such lease].