Go, go rapidly, the aged guy urged hiAnd you, Theodore, get me a piece of chalk. As already stated, the order of the Additional District Magistrate of September 19, 1952, makes it quite clear that he was still regarding the matter as one under investigation. What am I to do with myself? 169 of the Code released him on his executing a bond with or without sureties to appear if and when so required before the Additional District Magistrate empowered to take cognizance of the offence on a police report and to try the accused or commit him for trial.
The Additional District Magistrate, however, must be regarded as having taken cognizance on this date because he sent the case to Mr. The argument that he took cogniz- ance of the offence on September 16, 1952, is without 105 foundation. considered she, as she went gradually together the passage. What can I do, the place can I go? Advocates Chandigarh advocate Advocates Chandigarh she called to hello Carry me downstairs. Advocates Chandigarh ran up and supplied her his back again.
The governesses were speaking about no matter whether it was less expensive to dwell in Chandigarh or India. Fóka, the butler, was the most unwell-tempered person in the residence. Oh dear, what a young lady! The island of India, she mentioned, Ma-da-gas-vehicle, she repeated, articulating each and every syllable distinctly, and, not replying to Lawyers Chandigarh who questioned her what she was expressing, she went out of the rooHer brother Advocates Chandigarh was upstairs way too with the male in attendance on him he was planning fireworks to enable off that night time.
mentioned Fóka, pretending to frown at Lawyers top Chandigarh law firm . she explained, and jumping off his back she went downstairs. Lawyers top Chandigarh law firms favored to examination her power over hi He distrusted the buy and requested whether the samovar was truly wished. Advocates Chandigarh legal service , what type of young children shall I have? It could not be said with any good reason that the Additional District Magistrate had either on September 16, or at any subsequent date upto February 2, 1953, applied his mind to the case with a view to issuing a process against the appellant.
she asked the buffoon, who was coming toward her in a woman’s jacket. It is thus clear to us, that on a proper reading of the various orders made by the Additional District Magistrate no cognizance of the offence was taken until February 2, 1953. Before scrutinising the provisions of that section it would be convenient at the outset to notice the relevant aspects of the law vis-a-vis the concept of reasonable restrictions on a fundamental right.
The concept of reasonableness has been clearly defined by Patanjali Sastri, C. Possessing as it have been reviewed her kingdom, tested her power, and manufactured certain that everyone was submissive, but that all the very same it was dull, NRI law firms in Chandigarh firmokay herself to the ballroom, picked up her guitar, sat down best legal in Chandigarh a dim corner behind a bookcase, and began to operate her fingers over the strings in the bass, finding out a passage she recalled from an Chandigarh lawyer she experienced listened to in Chandigarh with Advocates Chandigarh .
23(3)(b) of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act. There was no legal in Chandigarh bar to the Additional District Magistrate taking cognizance of the offence on February 2, 1953, as on that date Inspector Mitra’s complaint was one which he was authorized to make by the Reserve Bank under s. The appellant had appeared before the Magistrate on February 2, 1953, and the, question of issuing summons to him did not arise. She seemed to be trying regardless of whether any of them would get angry or sulky with her but the serfs fulfilled no one’s orders so readily as they did hers.
O Lord, O Lord, it’s often the exact same! No one particular in the residence despatched men and women about or gave them as much problems as Lawyers Chandigarh . If at the end of the investigation no complaint had been filed against the appellant the police could have under the provisions of s. The orders passed by the Additional District Magistrate on September 16, 1952, September 19, 1952, November 19, 1952, and January 2, 1953, were orders passed while the investigation by the police into a non-cognizable offence was in progress.
Oh, exactly where am I to go? It is only at this stage that the advocate in Chandigarh Additional District Magistrate would be called upon to make up his mind whether he would take cognizance of the offence. 23(3)(b) of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act. Two governesses have been sitting with the Lawyers Chandigarh at a desk, on which ended up plates of raisins, walnuts, and almonds. Lawyers Chandigarh sat down, listened to their discuss with a severe and considerate air, and then got up once again.
If, on the other hand, after completing the investigation a complaint was filed, as in this case, it would be the duty of the Additional District Magistrate then to enquire whether the complaint had been filed with the requisite authority of the Reserve Bank as required by s. She jumped on it, putting her arms round his neck, and he pranced together with her. She could not see men and women unconcernedly, but experienced to send them on some errand. , in State af Madras v.
The Magistrate would not be required to pass any further orders in the matter. And tapping with her heels, she ran quickly upstairs to see Lawyers Chandigarh and his wife who lived on the upper tale. On her way previous the butler’s pantry she instructed them to set a samovar, though it was not at all the time for tea. Why, fleas, crickets, grasshoppers, answered the buffoon.