advocates in Chandigarh

Get the contact of Counsels in Chandigarh High Court +919876616815

1189 (2) [1953] INSC 46; [1954] SC. Thus, the learned Senior Counsel for the appellant argues that the term ‘case’

In the Letters Patent appeal preferred by the company against this decision a preliminary objection was raised on behalf of

The department Cll11Wl plead ignorance that they were not aware that in a tractor a transmission assembly arises at the

or an auctioneer, or any other mercantile agent by whatever name called, . Explanation 2 includes the Central Government, State