Notwithstanding the said allegation, the award dis- closes that no issue was raised on that count and no argument was advanced in support thereof. 19(6) of the Act, that the said award was binding between the parties and therefore the reference was bad in best Chandigarh law firm. 5 of 1949) and the East Punjab Safety (Amendment) Ordinance, 1951 (5 of 1951) but provided that notwithstanding such repeal any order made, notification or direction issued, appointment made or action taken under the said Act and in force immediately before the commencement of this Act shall, in so far as it is not inconsistent therewith, continue in force and be deemed to have been made, issued or top Chandigarh advocates taken under the corresponding provisions of this Act.
256 of the Government of India Act, 1935, in the same way: (Biswanath Khemka v. The Federal Court construed a Chandigarh legal services similar provision. Section 28 reads as below Nor is this Court alone top legal service in Chandigarh so thinking. 134(1) law firms (c) of the Constitution because he seeks to challenge the validity of the order of conviction and sentence top Chandigarh legal services passe against him in the three cases on the ground that the proceedings in all the said cases are void. nAct are required to be laid before each House of Parliament and when both the Houses agree then the Rules and Regulations can be given effect with such modification as may be made by the Parliament.
In the second written-statement filed by the Company on December 20, 1956, a contention was raised to the effect that the award dated June 21, 1951, was not terminated under s. Though it may not be quite relevant, it may be mentioned that even in 1951 when the dispute between the parties was referred to the Industrial Tribunal, though a similar contention was open to the Company and indeed was suggested by the Tribunal, it moved the Tribunal to give an award on the merits of the matter.
In evaluating or appraising the above, one should also bear in mind the distinction/difference between the corpus, the objects and the powers of the concerned entity. The decisive or acid test is whether on an overall view of the matter, the object is to make profit. ” Notwithstanding the expiry of the period of operation under sub-section (3), the award shall 145 continue to be binding on the parties until a period of two months has elapsed from the date on which notice is given by any party bound by the award to the other party or parties intimating its intention to terminate the award’.
He contends that, whereas the charges framed against him had to be tried according to the procedure prescribed for the trial of warrant cases, the learned trial magistrate tried all the cases according to the procedure prescribed for the trial of summons cases and that makes void all the proceedings including the final orders of conviction and the sentences. It must, however, be pointed out that this 13 98 Act does not continue the material provisions of the impugned Act such ass.
For the respondent, Mr. After meeting the expenditure, if any surplus results incidentally from the activity lawfully carried on by the educational institution, it will not cease to be one existing solely for educational purposes since the object is not one to make profit. The appellant has obtained a certificate from the High Court under Art. The King Emperor) (2); and so did the Privy Council in a Canadian case lawyers in Chandigarh Montreal (i) [1957] INSC 75; [1958] S.
I of 1951 by which the President extended some of the provisions of the earlier temporary Act in exercise of the powers conferred by s. 3 of the Punjab State Legislature (Delegation of Powers) Act, 1951 (46 of 1951), The provisions of that Act extended to the whole of the State of Punjab and came into force on September 13, 1951. 16 cannot be invoked for the purpose of validating the continuation of the subsequent proceedings against the appellant in the cases then pending against him.
He has invited our attention to the provisions of Act No. 16 of Act 46 of 1951 which repealed the East Punjab Public Safety Act, 1949 (Punj. Umrigar, however, contends that the appellant is wrong in assuming that the Act in fact expired on August 14, 1951. ” In the first written-statement filed by the Company before the Tribunal, no plea was taken based upon s. If this plea had been seriously pressed, the Tribunal would have raised a separate issue and the Union would have been in a position to establish that notice had been served on the Company as required by s.
The effect of the proviso to Section 7-A introduced by the amending Act makes it clear that the claim of juvenility may be raised before any court which shall top Chandigarh legal be recognised at any stage, even after final disposal of the case, and such claim shall be determined in terms of the provisions contained best legal in Chandigarh the Act and the Rules made thereunder which includes the definition of “juvenile” in Sections 2(k) and 2(l) of the Act even if the juvenile had ceased to be so on or before the date of commencement of the Act We may state that the language of Section 10(22) of the Act is plain and clear best Chandigarh legal and the availability of the exemption should be evaluated each year to find out whether the institution existed during the relevant year solely for educational purposes and not for the purposes of profit.
n”The High Court has made an observation that any income which has a direct relation or incidental to the running of the institution as such would qualify for exemption. This attitude might have been adopted by the Company either because it did not think fit to rely upon a technical point but had chosen to get a decision of the Tribunal on merits, or it might be that there was no basis for the contention, as the company might have received notice under the said section.