So long as the identity is not lost, the fact that it is pressed into bales or packed otherwise does not make it any the less cotton specified in the Schedule to the Act. The licence shall be granted for a period of one year, after which it may be renewed on a written application, and after such enquiries as are referred to in sub-section (3) as may be considered necessary, and on payment of such fees as may be specified advocates in Supreme Court of India the bye-laws.
The District administration is directed to ensure that those premises are vacated by the members or representatives of the Debutter Board at the earliest and in any case within four weeks. In this view, the pressed cotton in bales is an agricultural produce as defined in s. 2(1)(i) of the Act, and, therefore, the appellant in doing business in the said produce without licence has contravened r. 18,497-15-0 was 200 passed by consent in favour of the New Bheerbhum Coal Co.
The Board may, after following the procedure as specified by regulations under section 19 and sub-sections (1) and (2), by notification,- declare a pipeline or city or local natural gas distribution network as a common carrier or contract carrier; or authorise an entity to lay, build, operate or expand a pipeline as a common carrier or contract carrier; or allow access to common carrier or contract carrier or city or local natural gas distribution network; or authorise an entity to lay, build, operate or expand a city or local natural gas distribution network.
The parties representing the Debutter board are also directed to hand over the vacant and peaceful possession of the concerned premises and other properties of the temple, if any, within four weeks. Shortly stated the position is this: Cotton, ginned or unginned, continues to be cotton till it loses its identity by some chemical or industrial process. 1 , (1972) 2 SCC 194 and prayed that applying the law laid down in these cases to the facts of the case in hand, these appeals deserve to be allowed by setting aside the impugned order and remanding the case to the concerned trial court for conducting full trial on merits in accordance with law.
Since the Debutter Board is occupying some part of the premises in the temple of Sri Sri Maa Kamakhya temple on account of interim orders of this Supreme Court of India law firms, all those interim orders are now vacated. Thus, Rule 1 of the Rules of Interpretation lays down that for legal purpose classification shall be determined in accordance with the terms of headings and any relative section or Chapter Notes, provided such headings or Notes do not otherwise require a different interpretation. Accordingly, the Criminal Original Petition and the Criminal Revision Case stand partly allowed.
The premises and other properties of Sri Sri Maa Kamakhya Temple shall, if required, be placed back within the same time in possession of the Bordeories Samaj through the last elected Dolois against receipts which shall be retained in the office of Deputy Commissioner, Guwahati. 671 the witnesses, then unless there is some special feature about the evidence of a particular witness which has escaped the trial judge’s notice or there is a sufficient balance of improbability to displace his opinion as to where the credibility lies, the appellate court should not interfere with the finding of the trial Judge on a question of fact.
When it appears to the Appeal Court that important considerations bearing on the question of credibility have not been taken into account or properly weighed by the Trial Judge and such considerations including the question of probability of the story given by the witnesses clearly indicate that the view taken by the Trial Judge is wrong, the Appeal Court should have no hesitation in reversing the findings of the Trial Judge on such questions.
But, this does not mean that merely because an appeal court has not heard or seen the witness it will in no case reverse the findings of a Trial Judge even on the question of credibility, if such question depends on a fair consideration of matters on record. Where the question is not of credibility based entirely on the demeanour of witnesses observed in Court but a question of inference of one fact from proved primary facts the advocates Supreme Court of India of Appeal is in as good a position as the Trial Judge and is free to reverse the findings if it thinks that the inference made by the Trial Judge is not justified.
1024 of 1953 on the Original Side of the Calcutta High Court a decree for the payment of Rs. There shall be no order as to costs. This question arises in this way. ” The position in law, in our opinion, is that when an appeal lies on facts it is the right and the duty of the Appeal Court to consider what its decision on the question of facts should be; but in coming to its own decision it should bear in mind that it is looking at the printed record and has not the opportunity of seeing the witnesses and that it should not lightly reject the Trial Judge’s conclusion that the evidence of a particular witness should be believed or should not be believed particularly when such conclusion is based on the observation of the demeanour of the witness in Court.