Top Advocates in Punjab and Haryana High Court for Regular Bail

2 also indicates that the issues were with regard navigate to this web-site the action of the bank officers against respondent no. The rules prescribe the method of selection/recruitment. 1, he shall surrender the trophy to the Custom Authorities. 1, he will be allowed to keep the trophy with him. Suffice it to state that it is settled law that a distinction between right and interest has always been maintained. Both the sections are non cognizable and bailable and triable by Magistrate of First Class.

1058 of 2009 is liable to be quashed. As regards the right to seniority, this Court elaborately considered the incidence of the right to seniority and amendment of the Act in the latest decision in Ashok Kumar Gupta v. State of Haryana, 1986 Supp. On March 20, 1947, a notice was issued by the respondent whereby, in exercise of the powers conferred on it by s. Seniority is a facet of interest. In case order passed is Read Webpage the Full Posting, Full Article, in favour of respondent no. Failure to recognise the difference between cases to which s.

The Scientific Authority, which we are informed has already been constituted, shall consider the application and pass speaking order after giving opportunity of being heard to respondent no. The order shall be passed by the Scientific Authority within three months from the date the application is made by respondent no. 5000-8000, would be placed en-block below Assistants and Data Entry Operators Grade ‘C’.

SCC 584, and a host of other decisions. Application for the said purpose shall be preferred within four weeks from the date of receipt of the copy of This Webpage order. 2 being Complaint Case No. But the question is whether the Rules you can try these out be amended taking away the vested right. 6 of the General Clauses Act applies and those which are governed by the provisions of a temporary Act which does not contain the appropriate saving section has introduced an infirmity in the reasoning adopted in the judgment.

Bola AIR 1969 SC 118; Raj Kumar v. (2)From the total sale-proceeds in respect of the quantity fixed for export under section 4 for any year, there shall be deducted the total expenditure incurred by the export agency in respect us (this contact form) of the sugar, whether by way of administrative expenses or otherwise, and the balance shall be apportioned among the owners in proportion to the quantity of sugar delivered by them respectively (hiring that year.

4160 dated June 17, 1918, and intimated that the draft amendments would be considered by the respondent on or after April 21, 1947, and invited click here now – Full Article – objection in writing within 30 days from the publication of that notice. Parliament being alive to the legal position that the accused/suspects are not entitled to be heard Click at nrilegalservices.me any stage of the proceedings until issuance of process under Section 204, yet in Section 401(2) of the Code provided that no order in exercise of the power of the revision shall be made by the Sessions Judge or the High Court, as the case may be, to the prejudice of the accused or the other person unless he had an opportunity of being heard either personally or by pleader in his own defence.

In case order passed goes against respondent no. One of the items of amendments was as follows:- “(ii) ‘V-Tax on Entertainments’ 9 66 60 of the Cantonments Act, 1924 (11 of 1924), the respondent proposed to make, with the previous sanction of the Central Government, certain amendments in the notification of the Government of Bombay in the General Department No. Insofar as the inter-se placement between the Data Entry Operators Grade ‘B’ and Tax Assistants is concerned, Rule 5(iii) of the STA Rules, 2003 provided, that the date of their regular appointment in their respective grades, would determine their inter-se seniority in the cadre of Senior Tax Assistants.

Union of India, (1975) 4 SCC 13; K. 2 on the ground of alleged malafide and as such an offence under sections 166/500 I. This witness, as his evidence would clearly demonstrate, also did neither falter nor, was equivocal so as to suggest that he failed to recollect the execution of the document. 977) 5 SCC 201, relieving the need to reiterate all of them once over. For the foregoing reasons the 482 Petition deserves to be allowed and the criminal complaint filed by the respondent no.

(ii) In the same fashion as Assistants and Data Entry Operators Grade ‘C’, Rule 5(iii) of the STA Rules, 2003 provided, that Data Entry Operators Grade ‘B’ and Tax Assistants, who were earlier placed in the pay scale of Rs. , (1985) 1 SCC 523; T. The conditions, precedent for application of Section 71 of the Act 1872, therefore, are also not available in the context of the evidence of this witness. His evidence as well cannot be construed to be one of denial of execution of the Will.

(iv) More recent in time, is the judgment rendered by another three Judge Division Bench in S. In other words, the posts of Data Entry Operators Grade ‘B’ and Tax Assistants which had an inferior position adjudged on the basis of pay scales, vis–vis Data Entry Operators Grade ‘C’ and Assistants, prior to the promulgation of the STA Rules, 2003, were placed en-masse below Data Entry Operators Grade ‘C’ and Assistants, so as to preserve the said inferior position in the cadre of Senior Tax Assistants.