The petitioner’s warehouse was checked by Inspector Das who on finding some irregularity sealed the warehouse on December 8, 1953, and subsequently took possession of all the registers and stock cards. He further imposed a penalty of Rs. 2,55,349 under the new dispensation as against Rs. 587 of the House of Lords in Bath Justices’ Case(1), but a scrutiny of the latter case shows that in that case the licensing justices had themselves actively opposed the renewal of the licence before the compensation authority and instructed a solicitor to do so on their behalf click this site is not a duty cast on them by the statute whereas the licensing justices in dealing with an application for renewal of a licence and, when the question of renewal was referred for decision to the compensation authority, in sitting as members of that authority are merely carrying find out here now (simply click the next document) the duties in accordance with the procedure prescribed by the legislature.
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by KAPUR J. The appeal taken to the Central Board of Revenue was dismissed as the petitioner refused to deposit the penalty of Rs. In this petition he challenges the legality of certain orders passed by the Collector of Excise, Allahabad, which on appeal were confirmed and revisions against those orders were dismissed by the Central Government. 150 and the duty leviable thereon in lieu of confiscation.
22,755 on the old basis. If similar benefits were to be given to the other members of the staff who are not working journalists the annual increase in the burden will be Rs. – ” The basic wage there approximates to a bare minimum subsistence wage and no normal adult male covered by an award is permitted to work a full standard hours week at less than the assessed basic wage rate. 151(C) and 226 of the Central Excise Rules. 31, 597 for past gratuity and Rs. 24,807 every year for recurring gratuity as also Rs.
This is one of the orders which is challenged by the petitioner. The basic wage is expressed as the minimum at which normal adult male unskilled workers may legally be employed, differing from the amounts fixed as legal minima for skilled and semi- skilled workers, piece workers and casual workers respectively. visit this site right here is the concept of the ” minimum wage ” adopted by the Committee on Fair Wages. Held, further, that there could be no doubt, in view of the interpretation put upon Art.
There are however variations of that concept and a distinction has been drawn, for instance, in Australian industrial terminology between the basic wage and the minimum wage. Viswanatha Sastry, and, if it were res integra, some of us might be inclined not to agree with the reasoning and the conclusion of the earlier judgment, this Court is bound by its earlier decision and we do not see any justification to refer the question to a larger bench, particularly as we have come to the conclusion that the High Court was not justified in interfering with the order passed by the Tribunal in its discretion disallowing the material amendment.
which were found in the petitioner’s warehouse, were removed from the warehouse by the Inspector and stored in some other 364 place. There will be an increase in expenditure to the tune of Rs. The other members of the staff would have to be paid Rs. 1,46,351 and the total cost of closing down the whole concern would thus conic to Rs. 2,000 and a revision to the Central Board of Revenue was also dismissed for the same reason. It may, however, be stated that industrial decisions on the twin topics of gratuity and retrenchment compensation were not always uniform, and sometimes they disclosed an element of uncertainty and perhaps even ambiguity in their approach.
24,807 by reason of the retrospective operation of the decision. 30,900 by reason of the reduced working hours and increase in leave and holidays, a liability of Rs. The financial burden in the case of proof-readers who 77 are included in the definition of working journalists tinder the terms of the Act would be Rs. On December22,1953, 11 1/2 bags of kandi i. Thus it would be seen that the result of industrial decisions was that workmen, were held entitled both to gratuity and compensation on retrenchment and the amount of retrenchment compensation was measured by reference to the period of service rendered by the retrenched employee.
Against those orders the petitioner made certain representations to the Collector and some correspondence passed. The petitioner showed cause, the Collector heard the petitioner who had also filed written arguments. These decisions show that in England a statutory invasion of the common law objection on the ground of bias is tolerated by decisions, but the invasion is confined strictly to the limits of the statutory exception. The total costs of closing down if such an eventuality’ were contemplated would be Rs.
1,530 for recurring increase in wages of the working journalists. Finding the charges against the petitioner proved, the Collector ordered confiscation of the bags of kandi, imposed a fine of Rs. -The petitioner was a wholesale and retail dealer in tobacco at Banaras and also owned a private bonded warehouse for tobacco and held licences for the same. 19(1)(a) of the Constitution by this Court, that liberty of the press was an essential part of the freedom of speech and expression guaranteed by that Article and the press had thereunder the right of free propagation and free circulation without any previous restraint on publication.
On June 15, 1954, the Collector, Central Excise, issued a notice to the petitioner to show cause why a penalty should not be imposed on him for the contravention of Rules 151(C)and 226 of the Central Excise Rules, 1944, and why the bags of kandi should not be confiscatted. 1,08,997 for the working journalists only as against a liability of Rs.